2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexicon based feature extraction for emotion text classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the resulting affect dictionary includes only general categories of mood-or emotion-related words, rather than further distinguishing the type of emotion. More recent methods operate, for instance, via mixture models (Bandhakavi et al, 2017), fuzzy clustering (Poria et al, 2014), or by incorporating word embeddings (Li et al, 2017). The precision of dictionaries can further be improved by embedding these in linguistic rules that adjust for the surrounding context.…”
Section: Lexicon-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the resulting affect dictionary includes only general categories of mood-or emotion-related words, rather than further distinguishing the type of emotion. More recent methods operate, for instance, via mixture models (Bandhakavi et al, 2017), fuzzy clustering (Poria et al, 2014), or by incorporating word embeddings (Li et al, 2017). The precision of dictionaries can further be improved by embedding these in linguistic rules that adjust for the surrounding context.…”
Section: Lexicon-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that random forests tends to compute faster, while support vector machines yield superior performance (Chatzakou et al, 2017). These classifiers are occasionally, but infrequently, restricted to the subset of affect cues from emotion lexicons (Bandhakavi et al, 2017). However, the more common approach relies upon general linguistic features, i. e., bag-of-words with subsequent tf-idf weighting (Alm et al, 2005;Strapparava & Mihalcea, 2007).…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lexicons are linguistic tools for the automated analysis of text. Their most notorious uses are classification and feature extraction [5,2]. They can take many forms, the most common of which is a simple list of terms associated to a certain class of interest.…”
Section: Lexicon-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aman and Szpakowicz (2008) used Roget's Thesaurus along with WordNet-Affect for fine-grained emotion prediction from blog data. Bandhakavi et al (2017) propose a unigram mixture model (UMM) to create a domain-specific lexicon which performs better in extracting features than Point-wise Mutual Information and supervised Latent Dirichlet Allocation methods. Neviarouskaya et al (2007) propose a rule-based system which can handle informal texts in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%