LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words

Peereman, Ronald

doi:10.3758/bf03207735

Cited by 86 publications

(92 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach was applied to a set of 122 monosyllabic French words for which subjective frequency was assessed by Flieller and Tournois (1994) using a seven-point scale. FB consistency values on rime/ body correspondences was given by LEXOP (Peereman & Content, 1998). A first analysis confirmed that there was a large correlation between log objective frequency (from Imbs, 1971) and frequency judgments (r ϭ .78, p Ͻ .001) but no correlation at all between log objective frequency and rime/body consistency (computed by token; r ϭ .01).…”

Section: Experiments 5c: Does Fb Consistency Influence Frequency Judgmmentioning

confidence: 50%

“…First, to select word targets more similar to those used by Stone et al (1997), feedback consistency was defined exclusively with regard to rime/body correspondences. Second, since word selection in Experiment 1 was performed using the LEXOP database (Peereman & Content, 1998), the inconsistency of some rime/body correspondences might depend on the particular algorithm employed to parse orthographic strings into onsets and bodies. There were indeed several small differences in the way syllables were segmented in LEXOP and in the consistency analysis reported by Ziegler et al (1996).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The target words consisted of 28 feedback inconsistent words and 28 feedback consistent words selected from the LEXOP database (Peereman & Content, 1998) in which the consistency of the C 1 (onset), Vowel, C 2 (Coda), C 1 V (Lead), and VC 2 (Rime) units was computed for a set of 2449 monosyllabic French words. Most of the inconsistencies were carried by the vowel or the rime.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only 12 of the inconsistent items were used in the previous experiments. Words were categorized as FB consistent or inconsistent exclusively as a function of rime/body consistency using both the LEXOP database (Peereman &Content, 1998), andZiegler et al's (1996) consistency tables. All words were FF consistent and were four to six letters long.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Is Perception a Two-Way Street? The Case of Feedback Consistency in Visual Word Recognition

Peereman

Bonin

1998

Journal of Memory and Language

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is generally assumed that during reading, the activation produced over orthographic units feeds forward to phonological units. Supporting interactive models of word recognition, Stone, Vanhoy, and Van Orden (1997) recently claimed that phonological activation reverberates to orthographic processing units and consequently constrains orthographic encoding. They found that the consistency of the relations between phonology and orthography (feedback consistency) influenced lexical decision performance. We explored the effect in five experiments conducted with French words. Although feedback consistency affected writing performance, no significant effect was observed in lexical decision even when inconsistency was defined so as to maximize the effect. We also show that previous reports of consistency effects in French (Ziegler, Montant, & Jacobs, 1997a) may be due to a confound between consistency and word frequency, as assessed by subjective frequency estimates. We conclude that there is at present little evidence that sound-to-print consistency influences orthographic encoding in visual word recognition.

show abstract

Section: Experiments 5c: Does Fb Consistency Influence Frequency Judgmmentioning

confidence: 50%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Is Perception a Two-Way Street? The Case of Feedback Consistency in Visual Word Recognition

Peereman

Bonin

1998

Journal of Memory and Language

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In French, as in English, the phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences are highly inconsistent: There are one-to-many relations from phonemes to graphemes (Peereman & Content, 1999;Ziegler, Jacobs, & Stone, 1996;Ziegler, Stone, & Jacobs, 1997). For example, the phoneme /u/ in English can be spelled EW (as in new), UE (true), O (who), OO (too), and so on.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Variability in deaf children's spelling: The effect of language experience.

Leybaert¹,

Lechat²

2001

Journal of Educational Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

French-speaking hearing and deaf children, ranging in age from 6 years 10 months to 14 years 7 months were required to spell words including phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences that were either statistically dominant or nondominant. Of interest was whether the nature of linguistic experience (cued speech vs. sign language) and the precocity of such experience (early vs. late exposure) determines accuracy in the use of phoneme-to-grapheme knowledge. Cued speech is a system delivering phonemically augmented speechreading through the visual modality. Hearing and deaf children exposed to cued speech early at home relied on accurate phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences, whereas children exposed to cued speech later and at school only, and children exposed to sign language, did not. A critical factor in the development of the phonological route for spelling seems to be early and intensive exposure to a system making all phonological distinctions easily perceivable.Most of the spelling errors made by hearing children are compatible with the word phonological form. They reflect incomplete knowledge at three possible levels: word-specific orthographic information (e.g., "brane" /brein/ for brain in English, or "trin" krsl for train in French), contextual rules (e.g., "woz" for was in English, or "janbon" /jfib5/ for jambon in French), and morphological relationship (e.g., "speld" for spelled in English, or "peti" /psti/ for petit in French). By contrast, most of the spelling errors made by deaf youngsters reflect an incomplete knowledge of the word phonology (e.g., "vingear" for vinegar in English, "moule" /muls/ for moulin /mule/, and "escorle" /eskorla/ for escalier

show abstract

Bibliography

2017

Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics 2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words

Cited by 86 publications

References 24 publications

Is Perception a Two-Way Street? The Case of Feedback Consistency in Visual Word Recognition

Is Perception a Two-Way Street? The Case of Feedback Consistency in Visual Word Recognition

Variability in deaf children's spelling: The effect of language experience.

Bibliography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About