LGBT in the Military: Policy Development in Sweden 1944–2014

Abstract

This article contributes to the growing field of research on military LGBT policy development by exploring the case of Sweden, a non-NATO-member nation regarded as one of the most progressive in terms of the inclusion of LGBT personnel. Drawing on extensive archival work, the article shows that the story of LGBT policy development in the Swedish Armed Forces from 1944 to 2014 is one of long periods of status quo and relative silence, interrupted by leaps of rapid change, occasionally followed by the re-appearance of discriminatory policy. The analysis brings out two periods of significant change, 1971–1979 and 2000–2009, here described as turns in LGBT policy. During the first turn, the military medical regulation protocol’s recommendation to exempt gay men from military service was the key issue. During these years, homosexuality was classified as mental illness, but in the military context it was largely framed in terms of security threats, both on a national level (due to the risk of blackmail) and for the individual homosexual (due to the homophobic military environment). In the second turn, the focus was increasingly shifted from the LGBT individual to the structures, targeting the military organization itself. Furthermore, the analysis shows that there was no ban against LGBT people serving in the Swedish Armed Forces, but that ways of understanding and regulating sexual orientation and gender identity have nonetheless shaped the military organization in fundamental ways, and continue to do so.

Mind, Body and Boundaries: Self-Presentation on the Nordic LGBTQ Online Dating Scene

“…In the Nordic context, here exemplified by the Swedish conditions, the public opinion is in general supportive of sexual minorities (Peterson et al, 2018). To a varying degree, all political parties in the Swedish parliament embrace LGBTQ rights, as does the Swedish military (Sundevall and Persson, 2016;Svensson, 2016;Carlson-Rainer, 2017). An increasing numbers of health and social care providers are educated and LGBTQ-certified by the main Swedish LGBTQ organization RFSL (Kottorp et al, 2016).…”

A Rainbow Flag Worth Defending? Swedish Armed Forces’ Pride Campaigns 2017-2022

“…Up until the 1960s, there was an exemption from military duties based on military medical policies concerning homosexuality. This was contested by the Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex Rights (Riksförbundet för homosexuellas, bisexuellas, transpersoners, queeras och intersexpersoners rättigheter -RFSL) in the 1970s, and subsequently, the regulations for homosexual and transexual service members were revised (Sundevall and Persson 2016). However, homosexuality remained a formal diagnosis within the SAF which could be used to exclude gay men from service till 1989, ten years after the classification was removed from the Swedish Classification of Diseases (Sundevall 2014;Sundevall and Persson 2016) nr 43 (2-3) 2022 67 been attending Stockholm Pride every year, as part of the SAF's work towards diversity and anti-discrimination.…”

Superficial Allies: The Role of Legal Inclusion and Social Obedience in Stigma Processes

“…Lyons et al, 2017aLyons et al, , 2017b, military (e.g. Sundevall and Persson, 2016), or sports teams (e.g. Melton and Cunningham, 2014).…”