2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LGBT people and suicidality in youth: A qualitative study of perceptions of risk and protective circumstances

Abstract: Evidence suggests that lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people are more likely to attempt to take their own lives in their youth when compared to heterosexual and/or cisgender people. This study draws on in-depth interviews with 17 LGBT individuals living in England, and explores the narratives used by participants to better understand their perceptions of risk and protective circumstances to explain suicide attempts in youth. Using a Goffman-informed thematic analysis, results identified three key them… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study is concerned with the UPR, it follows the UN approach which centres on LGBT + issues-here defined as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual plus (the 'plus' is inclusive of other groups, such as asexual, intersex, queer and questioning). This aligns with a burgeoning academic literature that uses LGBT + as its frame of enquiry (see, e.g., Mikulak, 2018;Rivers et al, 2018). However, in doing so, we also acknowledge the commonalities and differences between LGB and 'Trans' issues (see, e.g., Cochran & Mays, 2017).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As this study is concerned with the UPR, it follows the UN approach which centres on LGBT + issues-here defined as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual plus (the 'plus' is inclusive of other groups, such as asexual, intersex, queer and questioning). This aligns with a burgeoning academic literature that uses LGBT + as its frame of enquiry (see, e.g., Mikulak, 2018;Rivers et al, 2018). However, in doing so, we also acknowledge the commonalities and differences between LGB and 'Trans' issues (see, e.g., Cochran & Mays, 2017).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Given the sexual orientation disparities that existed in this sample in planning and decision-making skills, it is critical that future research examine how to foster this internal asset among LGB and mostly heterosexual youth. This is particularly necessary given that many of the stressors linked with suicidal behavior that LGB youth experience are beyond their control (e.g., discrimination; Rivers, Gonzalez, Nodin, Peel, & Tyler, 2018).…”
Section: Developmental Assets As Protective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The triangulation of self-reports and hetero-reports will allow us to have further data to delve into the interpretation of homophobic victimization as an interpersonal phenomenon. Additionally, in future studies about homophobic victimization, we aim to include other variables regarding the disclosure—or not—of their sexual orientation, since the scientific literature shows different reflections on their benefits or prejudices regarding social support [15,17,18]. This knowledge could be worthy to help victims and to move forward in the prevention of this harmful violent phenomenon among peers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research carried out by Rivers [16] revealed that—(a) very few victims of homophobic aggressions ask for help to their teachers and only one in six admitted the discriminatory nature of the aggressions; and (b) one in four victims felt harassed by some teacher due to his/her sexual orientation. Nearly two decades after, a study had again showed that male and female adolescents reported the rejection that they suffered within their environment because they had revealed their sexual orientation [17]. In this way, victims of homophobic aggressions find themselves in a paradoxical situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%