2017
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1328225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LGBTQ Women, Appearance Negotiations, and Workplace Dress Codes

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore LGBTQ women's experiences with unwritten or formal dress codes at work. I asked: What are LGBTQ women's experiences in the workplace with appearance management, and what are LGBTQ women's experiences navigating the written and unwritten dress codes in the workplace? To answer the research question, interviews were conducted with 24 self-identifying LGBTQ women. Six key themes emerged from the data. Themes included (1) expressed sexual identity in appearance, (2) unwritt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work organizations enforce unofficial dress and appearance norms that regulate the degree to which outsiders can express gender or race at work (Dellinger, 2002). In this way, dress norms represent a process of navigation and ‘appearance management’ for outsiders (Kaiser, 1997); violation of such unspoken rules can reinforce one’s outsider status (Reddy‐Best, 2018). While all respondents spoke about impression management generally, the significance placed on dress was more salient — and more fraught — for women leaders (Haynes, 2012; Meriläinen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work organizations enforce unofficial dress and appearance norms that regulate the degree to which outsiders can express gender or race at work (Dellinger, 2002). In this way, dress norms represent a process of navigation and ‘appearance management’ for outsiders (Kaiser, 1997); violation of such unspoken rules can reinforce one’s outsider status (Reddy‐Best, 2018). While all respondents spoke about impression management generally, the significance placed on dress was more salient — and more fraught — for women leaders (Haynes, 2012; Meriläinen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From what we could gather, transgender consumers seek not only to satisfy their functional needs when buying intimate apparel, but it also expresses their willingness to experience the fantasies and the feelings involved in intimate apparel marketplace navigation. Issues mentioned in the literature, such as feeling beautiful and having consumption experiences influenced by personality traits and cultural background (Holbrook & Hirschman, 1982; Reddy‐Best, 2018) were also identified in the interviewees' statements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgender consumers' experiences with clothing and fashion are distinct from the experiences that cisgender 2 consumers have (Reddy‐Best & Pedersen, 2015). This difference is due to transgender consumers' need to communicate their identities (Reddy‐Best, 2018) or conceal them, attempting to prevent them from facing stigmatization and vulnerability (Baker et al, 2005; McCracken, 2010) in the latter case. Although intimate apparel is traditionally seen as an under‐the‐clothes piece (Reddy‐Best et al, 2022), there is a fashion trend of exposing these pieces (Foss, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respect is the need ensure the history, identity, beliefs, and value of all people are respectfully considered. This includes respecting the histories of exclusion and oppression and appreciating the impact that has on individuals and identity groups (Di Napoli et al, 2021;O'Loughlin et al, 2022;Radis & Nadan, 2021), respecting how people self-identify and how they choose to reflect and express their identity (Casey et al, 2019;Reddy-Best, 2018), respecting an individual's belief system (Héliot et al, 2020) and traditions (Caron et al, 2019;Tiwari et al, 2019), and recognizing and valuing the capability and contribution of all people (Grant & Kara, 2021;McCoy, 2021;Topić & Bruegmann, 2021).…”
Section: International Journal Of Social Science Research and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%