2023
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LGEANet: LSTM‐global temporal convolution‐external attention network for respiratory motion prediction

Abstract: To develop a deep learning network that treats the three-dimensional respiratory motion signals as a whole and considers the inter-dimensional correlation between signals of different directions for accurate respiratory tumor motion prediction. Methods: We propose a deep learning framework, named as LSTM-Global Temporal Convolution-External Attention Network (LGEANet). In LGEANet, we first feed each of the univariate time series into the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) module respectively and utilize the strengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These networks led to higher RMSEs (0.9mm for the LSTM and 0.68mm for the TCN) than that of UORO at 30Hz in our study, equal to 0.40mm, despite relatively shorter response times (280ms for the LSTM and 400ms for the TCN) and the similarity between the signal amplitude in [59] (from 0.6mm to 51.2mm) and our study (from 6mm to 40mm). Likewise, the nRMSE corresponding to prediction at f = 26Hz with an architecture combining LSTMs, TCNs, external attention, and a linear autoregressive model in [60], equal to 0.31, was approximately 3 times higher than that of UORO at f = 30Hz, despite the low horizon h = 231ms in that work. Similarly, when forecasting 26Hz Cyberknife data with a network comprised of a transformer encoder and LSTM layers, Tan et al reported MAEs and RMSEs at h ≥ 400ms higher than those corresponding to UORO at f = 30Hz in our research [51].…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These networks led to higher RMSEs (0.9mm for the LSTM and 0.68mm for the TCN) than that of UORO at 30Hz in our study, equal to 0.40mm, despite relatively shorter response times (280ms for the LSTM and 400ms for the TCN) and the similarity between the signal amplitude in [59] (from 0.6mm to 51.2mm) and our study (from 6mm to 40mm). Likewise, the nRMSE corresponding to prediction at f = 26Hz with an architecture combining LSTMs, TCNs, external attention, and a linear autoregressive model in [60], equal to 0.31, was approximately 3 times higher than that of UORO at f = 30Hz, despite the low horizon h = 231ms in that work. Similarly, when forecasting 26Hz Cyberknife data with a network comprised of a transformer encoder and LSTM layers, Tan et al reported MAEs and RMSEs at h ≥ 400ms higher than those corresponding to UORO at f = 30Hz in our research [51].…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most previous works about respiratory motion forecasting focused on the prediction of one-dimensional (1D) respiratory signals, but considering the correlation between time series corresponding to different moving points and directions may improve general tumor po-sition estimation accuracy. A straightforward approach consists of concatenating these components into a single vector used as the network input [36,37]; some other studies use a specialized module to capture interdimensional information, such as external attention in [60]. It was reported in [19] that using principal components from successive 3D tumor centroïd positions as input led to a higher forecasting accuracy than performing coordinate-wise prediction when h ≥ 0.4s with several classical machine learning algorithms.…”
Section: Respiratory Motion Forecasting With Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations