2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.075010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LHC luminosity and energy upgrades confront natural supersymmetry models

Abstract: The electroweak fine-tuning measure ∆ EW allows for correlated SUSY soft terms as are expected in any ultra-violet complete theory. Requiring no less than 3% electroweak fine-tuning implies upper bounds of about 360 GeV on all higgsinos, while top squarks are lighter than ∼ 3 TeV and gluinos are bounded by ∼ 6 − 9 TeV. We examine the reach for SUSY of the planned high luminosity (HL: 3 ab −1 at 14 TeV) and the proposed high energy (HE: 15 ab −1 at 27 TeV) upgrades of the LHC via four LHC collider search channe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We emphasize again that neutralino content of dark matter in the model is typically small order a percentage or less, and thus bulk of the dark matter must have a different source such as ultralight dark axion mentioned earlier [56,57]. The fact that the neutralino content of dark matter is small also appears in other recent models with small µ discussed in [43][44][45]. Figure 6: The SI proton-neutralino cross-section exclusion limits as a function of the LSP mass from XENON1T results taken from [121].…”
Section: Dark Matter Direct Detectionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We emphasize again that neutralino content of dark matter in the model is typically small order a percentage or less, and thus bulk of the dark matter must have a different source such as ultralight dark axion mentioned earlier [56,57]. The fact that the neutralino content of dark matter is small also appears in other recent models with small µ discussed in [43][44][45]. Figure 6: The SI proton-neutralino cross-section exclusion limits as a function of the LSP mass from XENON1T results taken from [121].…”
Section: Dark Matter Direct Detectionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Typically this leads to the average squark masses also lying in the TeV region. Such a situation is realized on the hyperbolic branch of radiative breaking of electroweak symmetry [34][35][36] (for related works see [37][38][39][40][41]). It turns out that there are at least two ways in which the squark masses may be large, i.e., either m 0 is large or m 3 is large lying in the several TeV region while m 0 can be relatively small.…”
Section: Model Implementation and Long-lived Staumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can see that ∆ EW < 30 is a conservative condition which accomodates 3.3% or less finetuning and allowsμ up to ∼ 360 GeV. The condition for naturalness puts strong bounds on stop and gluino masses [24]. For various natural MSSM models, and independent of the neutrino sector, upper limits have been calculated as mt 1 3.5 TeV and mg 6 TeV (with the exception of the natural anomaly mediated SUSY breaking model (nAMSB) [25] where gluino mass can reach up to 9 TeV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%