Liability impact of the hospitalist model of care

Abstract

BACKGROUND An increasingly large proportion of inpatient care is provided by hospitalists. The care discontinuities inherent to hospital medicine raise concerns about malpractice risk. However, little published data exist on the medical liability risks associated with care by hospitalists. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the risks and outcomes of malpractice claims against hospitalists in internal medicine. DESIGN Retrospective observational analysis. MEASUREMENTS Using claims data from a liability insurer‐maintained database of over 52,000 malpractice claims, we measured the rates of malpractice claims against hospitalists compared to other physician specialties, types of allegations against hospitalists, contributing factors, and the severity of injury in and outcomes of these claims. RESULTS Hospitalists had a malpractice claims rate of 0.52 claims per 100 physician coverage years (PCYs), which was significantly lower than that of nonhospitalist internal medicine physicians (1.91 claims per 100 PCYs), emergency medicine physicians (3.50 claims per 100 PCYs), general surgeons (4.70 claims per 100 PCYs), and obstetricians‐gynecologists (5.56 claims per 100 PCYs) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The most common allegation types made against hospitalists were for errors in medical treatment (41.5%) and diagnosis (36.0%). The most common contributing factors underlying claims were deficiencies in clinical judgment (54.4%) and communication (36.4%). Of the claims made against hospitalists, 50.4% involved the death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS Despite fears of increased liability from the hospitalist model of care, hospitalists in internal medicine are subject to medical malpractice claims less frequently when compared to other internal medicine physicians and specialties. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:750–755. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine

Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study

“… 56 57 Also, further supporting our approach, it has been argued that hospital care may be more subject to defensive medicine than outpatient care since the latter more often entails longitudinal patient relationships. 58 A fourth limitation is that we attributed resource use patterns in a given hospital admission to the attending physician of record, which may be imperfectly recorded. This error biases our measured relation between resource use and malpractice claims toward zero.…”

The Medical Liability Environment: Is It Really Any Worse for Hospitalists?

“…The high-acuity setting and the absence of longitudinal patient relationships in hospital medicine may theoretically raise malpractice risk, yet hospitalists' liability risk remains understudied. 2 The contribution by Schaffer and colleagues 3 in this issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine is thus welcome and illuminating. The researchers examine the liability risk of hospitalists compared to that of other specialties by utilizing a large database of malpractice claims compiled from multiple insurers across a decade.…”

Hospitalists and liability: Surprising findings that point back to patient safety

“…1 In contrast to previous work examining medical liability, 2,3 Schaffer and colleagues have been able to identify hospitalists specifically. 2,3 Perhaps surprisingly, their main finding was that the rate of claims against hospitalists was significantly lower than for nonhospitalist internists, emergency medicine physicians, general surgeons, and obstetricians-gynecologists.…”