Liberal international criminal law and legal memory: deconstructing the production of witness memories at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Abstract

International criminal tribunals and courts, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), are commonly understood within legal transitional justice scholarship as the primary response to mass human rights violations, not only in addressing impunity, but also in uncovering the truth of what happened and why. This conceptually orientated article aims to deconstruct legal witnessing and memory production at the ICTR in order to critique claims in legal scholarship that international criminal institutions are able to produce a collective memory of mass rights violations. Specifically, the article proposes an original conceptual framework using insights from critical theory, Giorgio Agamben (witness) and Paul Ricoeur (memory), which it is argued extends our understanding of the scope, and limitations, of liberal Western criminal institutions� (in)ability to make sense of past atrocities.

Transitional justice discourse in post-conflict societies in Africa: introduction

“…Benjamin Thorne (2021) focuses on witness memory at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), with an emphasis on the interplay between liberal international criminal law and legal memory. Thorne aims at deconstructing legal witnessing and memory production at the ICTR, as a critique in legal scholarship that purports that international criminal institutions are able to produce a collective memory of mass rights violations.…”