2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liberation of actin from actomyosin in meats heated to 65°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the control sample, only a low‐density band of actin was observed, while the densities of actin bands were increased significantly in samples treated with AMP, and the density increased with the increasing of AMP level, which indicated that actomyosin dissociation was very weak in duck breast meat and AMP favored actomyosin dissociation. The result was consistent with that by Okitani et al , who found that more actin was liberated from actomyosin of chicken, beef and pork skeleton muscles treated with AMP and IMP. Previous studies suggest that the binding of myosin motor domain to actin depends on the nucleotide or nucleotide analogue bound to myosin subfragment .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the control sample, only a low‐density band of actin was observed, while the densities of actin bands were increased significantly in samples treated with AMP, and the density increased with the increasing of AMP level, which indicated that actomyosin dissociation was very weak in duck breast meat and AMP favored actomyosin dissociation. The result was consistent with that by Okitani et al , who found that more actin was liberated from actomyosin of chicken, beef and pork skeleton muscles treated with AMP and IMP. Previous studies suggest that the binding of myosin motor domain to actin depends on the nucleotide or nucleotide analogue bound to myosin subfragment .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for actin extraction was performed according to Okitani et al , with slight modifications. Two grams of minced duck meat were mixed with 20 mL Weber–Edsall solution (0.6 mol L −1 KCl; 0.04 mol L −1 NaHCO 3 ; 0.01 mol L −1 Na 2 CO 3 ; pH 7.2) and homogenized at 12000 rpm for 30 s twice at intervals of 10 s. The obtained homogenate was transferred to a beaker and shaken for 24 h at 4 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to restraints that prevent the thick filaments containing myosin and the thin filaments containing actin from dissolving. Our previous study 11) suggests that these restraints in myofibrils were released by high concentrations of an alkaline salt solution (Weber-Edsall solution), because the actins that were liberated irreversibly from the thick filaments when the meats heated at 65 C were dissolved into 0.2 M KCl and NaCl only after the scaffolds of the myofibrils were destroyed by treatment of the heated meats with Weber-Edsall solution. These restraints might be bonds between thick and thin filaments and the scaffolds of myofibrils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for actin extraction was performed according to Okitani et al (2009), with slight modifications. Two grams minced duck meat was mixed with 20 mL of WeberEdsall solution (0.6 M KCl/0.04 M NaHCO 3 /0.01 M Na 2 CO 3 ; pH 7.2) and homogenized at 12000 rpm for 30 s twice at intervals of 10 s. The obtained homogenate was transferred to a beaker and shaken for 24 h at 4℃.…”
Section: Actomyosin Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 99%