2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIBRA-WA: a web application for ligand binding site detection and protein function recognition

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, from a technological standpoint, both DockingApp RF and the original DockingApp [ 27 ] are also planned to be released in the near future as a single server-side web application in a similar fashion to how the authors’ earlier released tools for catalytic site detection and binding site detection, ASSIST [ 59 ] and LIBRA [ 60 ], respectively, were merged and included back then in the LIBRA-WA [ 61 ] web application. This would, on the one hand, provide users with a convenient way of accessing DockingApp RF’s functionalities regardless of the specific platform or operating system while leveraging the computational power of a dedicated server for a more efficient computation of the docking results with respect to a desktop computer.…”
Section: Future Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, from a technological standpoint, both DockingApp RF and the original DockingApp [ 27 ] are also planned to be released in the near future as a single server-side web application in a similar fashion to how the authors’ earlier released tools for catalytic site detection and binding site detection, ASSIST [ 59 ] and LIBRA [ 60 ], respectively, were merged and included back then in the LIBRA-WA [ 61 ] web application. This would, on the one hand, provide users with a convenient way of accessing DockingApp RF’s functionalities regardless of the specific platform or operating system while leveraging the computational power of a dedicated server for a more efficient computation of the docking results with respect to a desktop computer.…”
Section: Future Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple solution to the Jmol issue is to use JSmol (10), a JavaScript replacement for Jmol. This is the avenue taken by 3DLigandSite (11), COFACTOR (12,13), COACH (14) ISMBLAB-LIG (15) and LIBRA (16). Though JSmol supports complex visualization options, it suffers from performance issues due to inefficiencies introduced when migrating Jmol code from Java to JavaScript.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, contacts between fragments and binding site’s residues were analyzed using a starting dataset derived from the ligand binding sites database of LIBRA [24]. The fragments were generated by applying BRICS [14] decomposition as implemented in the Python chemoinformatic library RDKIT (ver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragment-residue contact datasets were derived from LIBRA’s binding site database (whose last update dates back to 2017) [24]. LIBRA’s binding site is a semi-exhaustive binding site database derived from PDB [16] containing 209,431 binding sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%