2016
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Library of congress subject heading (LCSH) browsing and natural language searching

Abstract: Controlled topical vocabularies (CVs) are built into information systems to aid browsing and retrieval of items that may be unfamiliar, but it is unclear how this feature should be integrated with standard keyword searching. Few systems or scholarly prototypes have attempted this, and none have used the most widely used CV, the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), which organizes monograph collections in academic libraries throughout the world. This paper describes a working prototype of a Web applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been identified as mainly supporting navigation rather than replacing it, search will likely continue to be an important research area. There are many potential improvements to be made to search, for example by improving the display and interactivity of file search results (Smith et al, ), further integrating search with navigation by using queries to guide navigation (Fitchett et al, ), or further still, creating two‐way interactions between the file tree and search results, as has been done with Library of Congress subject heading (LCSH; Julien et al, ). The evaluation of desktop search, where recall and precision are imperfect measures, for reasons discussed above, may find benefit in the application of alternative measures, like mean reciprocal rank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it has been identified as mainly supporting navigation rather than replacing it, search will likely continue to be an important research area. There are many potential improvements to be made to search, for example by improving the display and interactivity of file search results (Smith et al, ), further integrating search with navigation by using queries to guide navigation (Fitchett et al, ), or further still, creating two‐way interactions between the file tree and search results, as has been done with Library of Congress subject heading (LCSH; Julien et al, ). The evaluation of desktop search, where recall and precision are imperfect measures, for reasons discussed above, may find benefit in the application of alternative measures, like mean reciprocal rank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite relatively clear indications that users prefer and perform navigation in FM contexts, desktop search has a discrete purpose and tagging shows promise, and therefore search and tagging systems will likely continue to develop in the coming years. Improved FM tools may, for example, usefully integrate search and navigation functions (Fitchett, Cockburn, & Gutwin, 2014;Julien, Asadi, Dinneen, & Shu, 2016), or improve searching capabilities by utilising the extensive metadata that users are more likely to remember (Gonçalves & Jorge, 2008a), such as file provenance (Jensen et al, 2010), file type (Blanc-Brude & Scapin, 2007), and time (Dumais et al, 2016).…”
Section: Understanding User Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subject heading is a controlled topical vocabulary that is assigned to bibliographic records to find and organize library materials based on topics [5]- [7]. It is important especially when searchers have limited information about the title or authors of documents, so that they can still find documents by their topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%