1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf02899960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Libri ricevuti e recensioni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13). 5 We also take advantage of the useful fact that p(i) = Ti T1 dt/P (t), and the expressions above can be derived by noting that ∆P , ∆T i andṖ are small quantities. Henceforth, to avoid clutter, we suppress the i, j indices and use bold-faced symbols to represent matrices or vectors, wherever no confusion would arise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(13). 5 We also take advantage of the useful fact that p(i) = Ti T1 dt/P (t), and the expressions above can be derived by noting that ∆P , ∆T i andṖ are small quantities. Henceforth, to avoid clutter, we suppress the i, j indices and use bold-faced symbols to represent matrices or vectors, wherever no confusion would arise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It 4 In most of the paper, we simply use P to denote the unperturbed period, when there is no danger of confusion. 5 We have implicitly assumed that the periastron time shift from external GWs is entirely due to their effect on the orbital period. In reality, there can be an (apparent) periastron time shift coming from center-of-mass linear momentum imparted by GWs, or from fluctuations in the orbital eccentricity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, it is not necessary for the pulsar to rotate very fast if the pulsar is a solid quark star (Xu 2003;Zhou et al 2004), because a solid quark star could have a larger elastic deformation, max ∼ 10 −4 (Owen 2005). Suppose there is no other dissipation mechanism other than gravitational wave radiation, then the typical damping time-scale of precession is τ rigid θ = 1.8×10 6 yr( /10 −7 ) −2 (P/0.001 s) 4 (I/10 45 g cm 2 ) −1 ∼ 10 6 -10 12 yr (Bertotti & Anile 1973;Cutler & Jones 2001). Therefore the bursting activity should remain with approximately the same period and duration provided that it is a solid quark star.…”
Section: T H E P U L S a Rmentioning
confidence: 99%