2002
DOI: 10.1126/science.1072961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lichen Guilds Share Related Cyanobacterial Symbionts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
212
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
16
212
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is true both for sexual species with horizontal photobiont transmission (P. canina, P. membranacea, P. rufescens) and for species that produce specialized asexually derived codispersal propagules (P. didactyla). Sharing of photobiont genotypes among different host species has also been reported previously among members of the Nephromataceae (Rikkinen et al, 2002;Lohtander et al, 2003;Wirtz et al, 2003), as well as within bryophytes (Costa et al, 2001) and cycads (Costa et al, 1999), but ours is the first study to include large enough sample sizes of both plant symbionts and lichen photobionts to infer that symbiont sharing among unrelated hosts is common. These results contradict earlier studies, based on smaller datasets, which suggested that species-level host specialization was prevalent in cyanolichens and that host species was a better predictor of symbiont genotype than geography (Paulsrud et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is true both for sexual species with horizontal photobiont transmission (P. canina, P. membranacea, P. rufescens) and for species that produce specialized asexually derived codispersal propagules (P. didactyla). Sharing of photobiont genotypes among different host species has also been reported previously among members of the Nephromataceae (Rikkinen et al, 2002;Lohtander et al, 2003;Wirtz et al, 2003), as well as within bryophytes (Costa et al, 2001) and cycads (Costa et al, 1999), but ours is the first study to include large enough sample sizes of both plant symbionts and lichen photobionts to infer that symbiont sharing among unrelated hosts is common. These results contradict earlier studies, based on smaller datasets, which suggested that species-level host specialization was prevalent in cyanolichens and that host species was a better predictor of symbiont genotype than geography (Paulsrud et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…strain 152. The lichen-symbiotic Nostoc form several lineages, including those associated with host fungi of the Nephroma guild (A-F) and the Peltigera guild (G-L) (4,12). This shows that the geographical origin of a lichen specimen does not predict the identity of the Nostoc symbiont, and that the production of detectable amounts of toxins is not restricted to well-defined groups within Nostoc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the known diversity of symbiotic Nostoc in lichen symbiosis far exceeds that of free-living Nostoc (2, 3). Extensive sampling of lichen communities has shown that most lichenized fungi tend to associate with restricted groups of Nostoc genotypes (4,5). Nevertheless, the identity of the cyanobacterial symbiont has been found for just a small percentage of all cyanolichen species, and tropical cyanolichens, in particular, have received very little attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering of Nostoc sp. PCC 73102 with Gunnera and lichen symbionts has been previously shown in other studies (Svenning et al, 2005;Rikkinen et al, 2002). Nostoc sp.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%