136 patients suffering from ALL were subdivided into 5 subtypes (C‐ALL, C/T‐ALL, pre‐T‐ALL, B‐ALL) according to rosetting tests and using specific antisera directed against membrane antigens. In addition, leukaemic blasts of all patients were investigated according to morphological and cytochemical criteria. In APh and ANAE, indices and the percentages of cases showing a granular staining pattern were high in pre‐T‐ and in T‐ALL, but low in C/T‐ and in C‐ALL. PAS‐staining, conversely, was more pronounced in C/T‐ and C‐ALL. APh proved to be more discriminative for recognition of the T‐ and pre‐T‐ALL subgroups than ANAE, but ANAE‐cytochemistry may be useful to detect contaminating normal T‐lymphocytes in ALL. Receptors for C3 were more frequent in C‐ and in T‐ALL than in C/T‐ and in pre‐T‐ALL, receptors for Fc were distributed equally among all subtypes. Positivity of C3‐ and Fc‐receptors was not correlated with cytochemical results. Morphological criteria were not sufficient for subclassification of ALL; the combination of APh‐ and PAS‐staining, however, is valuable to differentiate between C‐subgroups and T‐subgroups.