AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-5517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIDAR-based Relative Navigation of Non-Cooperative Objects Using Point Cloud Descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other solutions involve template matching for pose initialization and then exploit the typical ICP [25] for frame-to-frame pose estimation [9,16,17,26,27]. Variants of that methodology substitute the template matching scheme for pose initialization either with Principle Component Analysis (PCA) [9,28] or with global 3D feature matching using the Oriented Unique Repeatable Clustered Viewpoint Feature Histogram (OUR-CVFH) [14,29]. Other solutions available in the literature fuse pose estimation based on OUR-CVFH or on Spin Images [30] (a 3D local feature descriptor) and ICP, with gyroscopic data and then perform Target platform tracking using a Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter (MEKF) [10,28,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other solutions involve template matching for pose initialization and then exploit the typical ICP [25] for frame-to-frame pose estimation [9,16,17,26,27]. Variants of that methodology substitute the template matching scheme for pose initialization either with Principle Component Analysis (PCA) [9,28] or with global 3D feature matching using the Oriented Unique Repeatable Clustered Viewpoint Feature Histogram (OUR-CVFH) [14,29]. Other solutions available in the literature fuse pose estimation based on OUR-CVFH or on Spin Images [30] (a 3D local feature descriptor) and ICP, with gyroscopic data and then perform Target platform tracking using a Multiplicative Extended Kalman Filter (MEKF) [10,28,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current space navigation solutions that rely on computer vision concepts involve regional 3D feature description and not local description (A. Rhodes, Kim, Christian, & Evans, 2016; A. P. Rhodes et al, 2017), neglecting the state-of-the-art performance afforded by the latter type. It should be noted that (A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that (A. Rhodes et al, 2016) made an attempt using the local feature descriptor Spin Images (Andrew Edie Johnson & Hebert, 1998), however the research concluded that this descriptor is not optimal for space navigation. To the best our knowledge none other local descriptor has been used to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many model-based approaches have been recently proposed in the literature. Most of them are designed to operate on raw data, i.e., point-based algorithms [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], while others rely on the extraction of natural features or more complex descriptors, i.e., feature-based algorithms [ 19 , 20 ]. The results presented in these works highlight that some open challenges still need to be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%