2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiDAR data reduction using vertex decimation and processing with GPGPU and multicore CPU technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the huge amount of data retrieved by a high-density survey gives several issues in its storage and usage (e.g. Oryspayev et al 2012). Besides data management concerns, the economic aspect is equally relevant with prices reaching values of hundreds Euro per square kilometer (Lovell et al 2005;Johansen et al 2010;Jakubowski et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the huge amount of data retrieved by a high-density survey gives several issues in its storage and usage (e.g. Oryspayev et al 2012). Besides data management concerns, the economic aspect is equally relevant with prices reaching values of hundreds Euro per square kilometer (Lovell et al 2005;Johansen et al 2010;Jakubowski et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulky size of LiDAR data point cloud and complex file structure (especially for the foreseeable multi/ hyperspectral LiDAR waveform data) would impose certain computational burden. Recently, initialization toward data compression (Lipuš & Žalik, 2012;Mongus & Žalik, 2011), data structure and file handling (Elseberg, Borrmann, & Nüchter, 2013), high performance computing framework (Han, Heo, Sohn, & Yu, 2009;Lee, Gasster, Plaza, Chang, & Huang, 2011) and GPU-based processing Oryspayev, Sugumaran, DeGroote, & Gray, 2012) have been addressed and researched. Some other attempts have also been found to use compressed LiDAR data for land cover classification Toth, Laky, Zaletnyik, & Grejner-Brzezinska, 2010) and digital 3D modeling (Jang, Choi, & Cho, 2011).…”
Section: Further Development Of Lidar Data Processing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method performs very well, it is extremely time consuming (Lee, 1991). Thus, it is impractical to reduce LiDAR data with huge data volumes, especially under the common computation environment (Oryspayev et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%