2019
DOI: 10.1002/we.2430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiDAR measurements for an onshore wind farm: Wake variability for different incoming wind speeds and atmospheric stability regimes

Abstract: Wind measurements were performed with the UTD mobile LiDAR station for an onshore wind farm located in Texas with the aim of characterizing evolution of wind-turbine wakes for different hub-height wind speeds and regimes of the static atmospheric stability. The wind velocity field was measured by means of a scanning Doppler wind LiDAR, while atmospheric boundary layer and turbine parameters were monitored through a met-tower and SCADA, respectively. The wake measurements are clustered and their ensemble statis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(155 reference statements)
5
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4.2 is carried out using statistics collected under near-neutral conditions at Alpha Ventus, i.e., low atmospheric turbulence. Nevertheless, atmospheric turbulence conditions has a strong impact on the wake development (Kumer et al, 2017;Zhan et al, 2020), and wind turbine loads Kretschmer et al, 2018). Further, the lidar measuring characteristics can impact the accuracy of reconstructed fields (Lundquist et al, 2015), thus that of load predictions.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2 is carried out using statistics collected under near-neutral conditions at Alpha Ventus, i.e., low atmospheric turbulence. Nevertheless, atmospheric turbulence conditions has a strong impact on the wake development (Kumer et al, 2017;Zhan et al, 2020), and wind turbine loads Kretschmer et al, 2018). Further, the lidar measuring characteristics can impact the accuracy of reconstructed fields (Lundquist et al, 2015), thus that of load predictions.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The streamwise component is estimated from the line-of-sight velocity through an equivalent velocity approach (Zhan et al, 2019), then mean velocity and turbulence intensity (i.e. the ratio between standard deviation and mean) are reconstructed through the LiSBOA.…”
Section: Lisboa Validation Against Virtual Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach, Iungo and Porté-Agel (2014) detected a significant dependence of the wake recovery rate on atmospheric stability based on time-averaged volumetric LiDAR scans. The same concept was expanded by other authors using ensemble statistics (Machefaux et al, 2016;Carbajo Fuertes et al, 2018;Zhan et al, 2019Zhan et al, , 2020. Kumer et al (2015) carried out a comparison between instantaneous, 10 minutes and daily-averaged velocity and turbulence intensity fields around utility-scale wind turbines, highlighting the presence of persistent turbulent wakes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations