Lidars: A Key Component of Urban Biodefense

Abstract

A biological aerosol attack in a city could infect tens of thousands of people. In the absence of announcements by the attacker or detection by present point detection systems, victims would be unaware of their exposure prior to developing symptoms. Since infections are most effectively countered before the onset of symptoms, detection technologies that provide early awareness of an attack should be given high priority. Current biological point detection (BPD) systems collect environmental air samples and then analyze them in laboratories so as to permit detection within 12-36 hours of an attack. Improvements in the pipeline may reduce this lag time to as little as a few hours. However, BPD systems have inherent weaknesses when used to detect and respond to an aerosol attack. The likelihood of a limited number of BPD systems intercepting an aerosol plume in a vast attack space may be low. Moreover, BPD systems do not provide critical information needed for response, such as the source location, precise time, and geographic reach of an attack. The missing information would invaluably guide prophylaxis distribution, identification of contaminated areas, and criminal apprehension. This article describes how lidars used for real-time observation of aerosol plumes could complement BPD systems by providing fine-scale spatial and temporal information. A lidar system also could be used to corroborate positive BPD system results, to improve reaction to positive results, and/or to provide an independent basis for low-regret protective steps. Lidar systems can resolve key biodefense challenges, and this article describes three compatible concepts of operations. Leveraging lessons from a lidar system now operating at the Pentagon, a test of an expanded lidar network would provide immediate protection for key Washington, DC, assets, demonstrate the synergy of BPD systems and lidars, and provide a test bed for research to improve lidar's shortcomings.

Boreal tree pollen sensed by polarization lidar: Depolarizing biogenic chaff

“…This has implications for allergy sufferers who follow standard pollen count reports, and yet can be more severely affected by local concentrated pollen blooms. These findings also have implications for homeland security purposes, because it has been pointed out that polarization lidars have considerable promise in the real‐time identification of potentially hazardous dispersions of released aerosols, especially at near‐infrared laser wavelengths where the molecular backscattering contributions are much less significant [ Mayor et al , 2007, 2008]. With lidar, molecular scattering displays the wavelength λ −4 dependence of Rayleigh scattering.…”

Comparison of an analog direct detection and a micropulse aerosol lidar at 1.5 - μ m wavelength for wind field observations—with first results over the ocean

“…REALs built by ITT Corp. operate at 20 Hz. 17 No integration of backscatter signal from multiple pulses in time is required to observe atmospheric structure over a long path (typically 3 to 5 km). The REAL pulse duration is ∼6 ns (corresponding to 1.8 m in length) and the receiver subsystem employs a 14-bit analogto-digital converter operating at 100 MSPS.…”

Prevention of Biothreats: A Look Ahead

“…However, this type of technology can generate too many false-positives because of other factors that create clouds, and it can only detect aerosol attacks, limiting its potential utility to outdoor attacks. 2 3. Tracking exposure in human hosts.…”