2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2005.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lie superalgebras, Clifford algebras, induced modules and nilpotent orbits

Abstract: Let g be a classical simple Lie superalgebra. To every nilpotent orbit O in g 0 we associate a Clifford algebra over the field of rational functions on O. We find the rank, k(O) of the bilinear form defining this Clifford algebra, and deduce a lower bound on the multiplicity of a U (g)-module with O or an orbital subvariety of O as associated variety. In some cases we obtain modules where the lower bound on multiplicity is attained using parabolic induction. The invariant k(O) is in many cases, equal to the od… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular it would also be of interest to construct general theories as in [1,2,18,26] for Lie superalgebras. For instance there seems to exist an interesting link with (co)adjoint orbits, see [29]. As will become apparent in the current paper, the representations corresponding to the Joseph ideal for Lie superalgebras can not always be expected to be unitarizable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In particular it would also be of interest to construct general theories as in [1,2,18,26] for Lie superalgebras. For instance there seems to exist an interesting link with (co)adjoint orbits, see [29]. As will become apparent in the current paper, the representations corresponding to the Joseph ideal for Lie superalgebras can not always be expected to be unitarizable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Now set Y = G.e and Z = G.e. Thanks to [24,Theorem 6.8], dim Z = dim Y = dim G.e = dim G ev .e. By the above arguments, we have that…”
Section: Lemma 21 ([20 Lemma 26])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Note that the superscheme G.e is of dimension (dim G ev .e, dim g1 − dim(g1) e ) (see [24,Theorem 6.8]). And the superscheme G.e has the same dimension as the one of G.e .…”
Section: Lemma 21 ([20 Lemma 26])mentioning
confidence: 99%