2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.09055
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lie Theory for Fusion Categories: a Research Primer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important class of fusion categories are the categories of level k integrable representations of an affine Lie algebra g, which we denote as C(g, k). We direct the reader to [15] for more details. Using the above Theorem we are able to show that if g is a Lie algebra of type A n , B n , C n , D 2n+1 , or G 2 , then the category C(g, k) has no non-trivial gauge auto-equivalences, and if g is a Lie algebra of type D 2n , then the gauge auto-equivalence group of C(g, k) is isomorphic to Z 2 .…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important class of fusion categories are the categories of level k integrable representations of an affine Lie algebra g, which we denote as C(g, k). We direct the reader to [15] for more details. Using the above Theorem we are able to show that if g is a Lie algebra of type A n , B n , C n , D 2n+1 , or G 2 , then the category C(g, k) has no non-trivial gauge auto-equivalences, and if g is a Lie algebra of type D 2n , then the gauge auto-equivalence group of C(g, k) is isomorphic to Z 2 .…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 9.4. Let k ∈ N and consider C(sl 2 , k), the modular tensor category of level k integrable representations of sl 2 (see [15]). This modular category always has a non-trivial invertible object (k), which is a boson if k ≡ 0 (mod 4), and is a fermion if k ≡ 2 (mod 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprising little knowledge of these categories is required for this paper, so we keep the details to a minimum. For additional details we point the reader to [45] for an expository explanation of the modular categories C(g, k), and to [1,35] for a detailed exposition. We mainly restrict our attention to the case when g is one of sl r+1 , so 2r+1 , so 2r+1 , or g 2 , as these are the Lie algebras we deal with in this paper.…”
Section: Modular Tensor Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here a ∨ j are the co-labels of g, given in Table 1 for the relevant Lie algebras in this paper. The fusion rules for the categories C(g, k) can be computed using the Weyl chamber of g. The details of this procedure are complicated, so we direct the reader to [45,Section 5] for the details. We will recall relevant fusion rules of the categories C(g, k) as needed throughout the paper.…”
Section: Modular Tensor Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To each rank n ∈ Z ≥1 complex finite-dimensional simple Lie algebra of Dynkin type X n , and level k ∈ Z ≥1 one associates a modular tensor category which we abbreviate X n,k . One can refer to [46] for a technical outline of these examples and further references. Weakly quadratic categories X n,k are entirely described and the only fields appearing are Q( √ N ) for N = 2, 3, 5, 6, 21.…”
Section: Families Of Weakly Quadratic Fusion Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%