2012
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8796.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life after New Media

Abstract: An argument for a shift in understanding new media—from a fascination with devices to an examination of the complex processes of mediation. In Life after New Media, Sarah Kember and Joanna Zylinska make a case for a significant shift in our understanding of new media. They argue that we should move beyond our fascination with objects—computers, smart phones, iPods, Kindles—to an examination of the interlocking technical, social, and biological processes of mediation. Doing so, they say, reveals … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, this essay shows and tells different possibilities of oil-in the way that Sarah Kember and Joanna Zylinska argue for media practice as critique (Kember and Zylinska 2012). In a broader context, the work aims for what science studies and critical race scholar Ruha Benjamin proposes: a third way of doing knowledge production that is not purely fact nor purely fiction because facts alone are not enough (Benjamin, n.d.).…”
Section: Oil Art Agential Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, this essay shows and tells different possibilities of oil-in the way that Sarah Kember and Joanna Zylinska argue for media practice as critique (Kember and Zylinska 2012). In a broader context, the work aims for what science studies and critical race scholar Ruha Benjamin proposes: a third way of doing knowledge production that is not purely fact nor purely fiction because facts alone are not enough (Benjamin, n.d.).…”
Section: Oil Art Agential Realismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Can they filter through, when those listening are so far removed from the original context of production, arriving after the trace of analogue continuity has been fundamentally, irrevocably transformed via digitised consumption? How does Bush's ‘desire to carve and hence adjust the world’ (Kember and Zylinska 2012, p. 89), her sound world, translate into a technical context continually and rapidly splintered into information bits and spliced together again, a world continually processing calculations? Do we hear analogue, do we feel it, or can it be best understood as an intention or orientation within time – an invitation to listen, a mnemotemporal technique, that echoes within the sonic infrastructure at several points removed from the scenes of transmission?…”
Section: Director's Cut Not Remixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This temporal quality is impossible to pin to an exact point – comparable with the winding back and forth of analogue tape in edit/playback – the point at which we may say: there the analogue is. We may surmise, however, that utilising analogue technologies to re-produce the songs so that they may be heard again – and differently – is a strategy to ‘make cuts where necessary, while not forgoing the duration of things’ (Kember and Zylinska 2012, p. 81).…”
Section: Director's Cut Not Remixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…¶12 Kember and Zylinska's reading of performative media suggests that our relationship with memory as it is mediated by technologies of recording and presentation like the video cameras and projectors used in my theatrical production, create "media events with a difference." 22 These are not simply representations of performances, nor memories of action, but, in the vein of J. L. Austin's performative utterances, 23 they are co-creations that have a "lifeness," 24 an agency, and unanticipated potentiality of their own. Kember and Zylinska point to the example of the "event" of turning on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN to try to discover the elusive Higgs-Boson, dubbed the "God particle," a building block for all matter in the universe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%