2004
DOI: 10.21236/ada432564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Analysis Development and Verification. Delivery Order 0012: Damage Tolerance Application of Multiple Through Cracks in Plates With and Without Holes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data used to develop closed-form solutions for each crack tip were obtained from a previous (2004) AFRL in-house effort [6] to characterize the effect of an open hole on an adjacent through crack. The finite element data 7 were spline fit to develop a table look-up solution for each crack tip.…”
Section: R/d and C/cmaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used to develop closed-form solutions for each crack tip were obtained from a previous (2004) AFRL in-house effort [6] to characterize the effect of an open hole on an adjacent through crack. The finite element data 7 were spline fit to develop a table look-up solution for each crack tip.…”
Section: R/d and C/cmaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code, named PISA (Probabilistic Investigation for Safe Aircraft), is able to simulate the nucleation and subsequent growth of interacting cracks in aerospace metallic components, such as riveted joints and stiffened panels, until the final failure . There are some computer codes already available such as NASGRO and AFGROW, which are used for damage tolerance design of aerospace components by simulating the propagation of cracks in different geometric configurations. The PISA code differs from these codes because, even if it carries out a deterministic calculation of the cracks growth for each simulation, it is organized to be used for a probabilistic design, in order to evaluate the probability of failure of structural components …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%