2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-012-1092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-bearing primordial planets in the solar vicinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…at the epoch when the first stellar light illuminated the Universe at redshifts z 10 (see, e.g., Scannapieco et al 2006). It is worth mentioning in this connection that very recently Wickramasinghe et al (2012) presented arguments that primordial free-floating planets of solid hydrogen may account the whole "missing baryons" in the Universe. When recalculated for the Milky Way, the number of such primordial planets shall be as numerous as ∼ 10 14 .…”
Section: Planets In the Early Universementioning
confidence: 98%
“…at the epoch when the first stellar light illuminated the Universe at redshifts z 10 (see, e.g., Scannapieco et al 2006). It is worth mentioning in this connection that very recently Wickramasinghe et al (2012) presented arguments that primordial free-floating planets of solid hydrogen may account the whole "missing baryons" in the Universe. When recalculated for the Milky Way, the number of such primordial planets shall be as numerous as ∼ 10 14 .…”
Section: Planets In the Early Universementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A different approach was taken by Wickramasinghe et al [ 69 ], who pointed out that large impacts–like the one that resulted in the Chicxulub crater 65 million years ago–would eject large amounts of debris, including a microbial load, into the zodiacal cloud. During the impact, a significant fraction of material would not have been shocked and heated to sterilization levels, and microbes may be able to stay viable in the cloud for millions of years [ 70 , 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the impact, a significant fraction of material would not have been shocked and heated to sterilization levels, and microbes may be able to stay viable in the cloud for millions of years [ 70 , 71 ]. Wickramasinghe et al [ 69 ] considered that scenario for an Earth-type planet seeding a rogue planet as realistic. If so, the same should be true for the reverse transport, from the rogue planet to the planet within the solar system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When samples of the meteorite were examined using an electron microscope there was little room for disputing the existence of fossilised microbial structures, including diatoms, the characteristic morphologies and microstructures of which were diagnostic of their biological provenance [14,28,29] The voices of dissent that have been uttered, mostly off-stage, are to the effect that the rocks containing these microfossils cannot be accepted as meteorites. The porous, fluffy structure of the stones does not readily fit with any well-established meteorite class, and so also is their high silica content.…”
Section: Sri Lankan Meteoritementioning
confidence: 99%