Life Cycle Approaches for the Environmental Impact Assessment of Organizations: Defining the State of the Art

Abstract

Organizations play a key role in reducing anthropogenic pressure on the natural environment. The first step towards improving their sustainability performances is the implementation of methodologies that take into consideration multiple environmental impact categories, as well as the entire value chain. The attention of scholars and practitioners was initially addressed to the analysis of products and processes, yet in a few cases in which they were addressed, the approaches used for organizations had a limited scope and range of use. Only in recent years have they been framed in a life cycle perspective. This article analyzes two recent life cycle-based methodologies that have their focus on the organization, namely Organization Environmental Footprint (OEF) and Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (O-LCA). The goal is to define the state of the art of their methodological and current application developments and consider the relevance that these methodologies can have, both in terms of internal and external commitment (e.g., for the supply chain actors) and of reporting and communication requirements. The research was carried out starting from scientific databases, integrating technical legislation and secondary literature. The results obtained allowed tracing the first evolutionary trends, identifying the main authors and scientific journals and highlighting the relevant issues according to the researchers. A content and bibliometric analysis was performed that included all the contributions published so far. Projects and case studies that practically applied the two methodologies were also identified and analyzed. Finally, the main differences between the two methodologies were highlighted and future developments were hypothesized.

Environmental Management in German Hospitals—A Classification of Approaches

“…Thus, routine processes in specific departments can be optimized, such as in purchasing (e.g., by considering more environmental criteria for supplier selection) or in waste treatment procedures (e.g., by training employees on waste separation). Environmental accounting methods, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) or Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) can help to determine the environmental impacts of products and processes in order to derive recommendations on where to initiate changes and optimize existing procedures [28][29][30][31]. Thus, conducting LCA studies itself can be an organizational signal for a lived environmental process that displays managerial efforts to assess and consider environmental issues within management.…”

Industrial Ecology and Innovation: At What Point Are We? Editorial for the Special Issue “Industrial Ecology and Innovation”

“…To further emphasize the role of life cycle-based approaches in the Industrial Ecology research field, Rimano et al (2019) propose the article entitled "Life Cycle Approaches for the Environmental Impact Assessment of Organizations: Defining the State of the Art", in which, through a systematic literature analysis, the state of the art and the current application developments of those approaches have been defined. In particular, the analysis focused on the Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (O-LCA) and the Organization Environmental Footprint (OEF), which currently represent the main life cycle-based methodologies designed to evaluate the environmental performance of organizations.…”

A Framework to Assess Manufacturers’ Circular Economy Readiness Level in Developing Countries: An Application Case in a Serbian Packaging Company

“…Notwithstanding the multiple benefits occurring with the adoption of the CE paradigm, companies often do not own the needed assets, knowledge, skills, and capabilities to effectively exploit it [32]. Several methods and indexes have been detected in the literature to support companies in measuring and assessing their circularity degree [33][34][35]. However, a shortage of best practices, guidelines, learning experiences, frameworks, and models capable of guiding manufacturers in measuring their circular level and tracking a roadmap towards an improvement of their circular readiness is raised in the literature [21,34].…”