2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GWP values fell in the interval between 0.28 and 0.52 kg CO 2 eq./kWh for the APG system and between 0.12 kg and 0.96 kg CO 2 eq./kWh for the COG case. These results were in the range of values that characterize the carbon footprint of natural gas-fired power generation [66,67]. The contribution of the hydrogen recovery stage in this category is much greater than that of the cell, being between 82% and 90% for the APG case and from 61% to 95% for the COG system.…”
Section: Life-cycle Impact Assessment Based On Energy Productionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The GWP values fell in the interval between 0.28 and 0.52 kg CO 2 eq./kWh for the APG system and between 0.12 kg and 0.96 kg CO 2 eq./kWh for the COG case. These results were in the range of values that characterize the carbon footprint of natural gas-fired power generation [66,67]. The contribution of the hydrogen recovery stage in this category is much greater than that of the cell, being between 82% and 90% for the APG case and from 61% to 95% for the COG system.…”
Section: Life-cycle Impact Assessment Based On Energy Productionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In this way, it is possible to state which route is most appealing for the conversion of this feedstock, but it is impossible to verify whether BG could represent a suitable alternative to natural gas. Analyzing the GWP for the production of H 2 starting from BG or BM, the impact of the production of a certain amount of hydrogen depends on the feed used and the technology applied for biogas upgrading [42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the two production processes was based on the following assumptions: Operating in steady state. Ignoring the heat loss. Ignoring the kinetic energy, potential energy, and pressure drop. Ignoring the pressure drop in the whole process. Solutions are in equilibrium. …”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumptions. The analysis of the two production processes was based on the following assumptions: 34 (1). Operating in steady state.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%