2018
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment calculative practices in the Swedish biofuel sector: Governing biofuel sustainability by standards and numbers

Abstract: Since the introduction of the European Union's Renewable Energy Directive (RED), biofuel‐producing firms are required to perform life cycle assessment (LCA) based greenhouse gas accounting in order to fulfill part of directive's sustainability criteria. This paper adopts the concepts of “governing by standards” and “governing by numbers” to understand the LCA practices of biofuel‐producing firms and assess the critical moments of friction between these alternative modes of governance. We focus our analysis on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the residuals are not autocorrelated and there are no collinearity problems among the independent variables. The conclusions are in line with other recent papers [37][38][39][40][41] on the nexus between RES and CO 2 levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the residuals are not autocorrelated and there are no collinearity problems among the independent variables. The conclusions are in line with other recent papers [37][38][39][40][41] on the nexus between RES and CO 2 levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The negative coefficient of variable X1 reveals that the renewable energy variable has a negative and significant effect on CO 2 emission, and a one-unit increase in the rate of renewable energy in total energy consumed will lead to a decrease in CO 2 emission rates by 0.654, which is congruent with the findings achieved by [41]. Also, the negative coefficient of X2 means that biofuel production has a negative and strong impact on CO 2 emissions, and a one-unit increase in biofuel production will lead to a decrease in CO 2 by 0.983, which is in line with [42]. Moreover, the negative coefficient of X3 explains that resources productivity has a negative and strong effect on the decrease in CO 2 emissions, which confirms the study by [43].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Policies vary significantly in their tactics to promote the green energy transition in times of crisis, according to the specific aim pursued (i.e., profit, jobs, or EU targets) [32,33]. Sweden demonstrates best practice among member states in the development of green fuels [34], and some authors have focused their attention on the relationship between achieving regulatory compliance and improving biofuel sustainability [35]. In Sweden, public organizations make a significant contribution to the shift-some municipalities use environmentally friendly cars, Swedavia steers via a taxi queuing system, and Stockholm Public Transport procures biogas, matching the production of municipal wastewater treatment plants [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%