2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-019-02511-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of a decentralized greywater treatment alternative for non-potable reuse application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In decentralized systems, wastewater streams are smaller at all points, which means less environmental damage. The construction of a decentralized system also generates less disturbance to the environment as collection pipe diameters and lengths are smaller, and pipes are installed at shallow depths and exhibit a more flexible design ( Nhapi, 2004 ; Opher and Friedler, 2016 ; Masmoudi Jabri et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In decentralized systems, wastewater streams are smaller at all points, which means less environmental damage. The construction of a decentralized system also generates less disturbance to the environment as collection pipe diameters and lengths are smaller, and pipes are installed at shallow depths and exhibit a more flexible design ( Nhapi, 2004 ; Opher and Friedler, 2016 ; Masmoudi Jabri et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocarriers can wash out of the reactor over time. [ 159 ] Rotating biological contactor 0.0043-0.3000 1.2 COD = 84-89%, BOD 5 = 94%, TSS = 90%, TKN = 75% 0.1 Low operational cost, low technical personnel requirements, good organic removal Limited removal of pathogens and extra filtration is often needed to filter biofilm particles. [ 160 ] Gravity-driven membrane bioreactor 0.0014-0.0029 0.02-0.04 TOC = 80-95% - No backwashing or chemical and physical cleaning are required, and low energy requirement Low permeate flux, membrane fouling [ 161 ] Nano-filtration membrane treatment 52 10 COD = 98.0-99.7%, TOC = 97.7-99.6%, Salinity = 70%, SS = 100%, E. coli = 100% 5-6 Higher rejection efficiency, potent for the separation of small organic molecules, used in the desalination process Prone to membrane fouling, high operating cost involves membrane cleaning, an energy-intensive process [ 162 ] Moving bed biofilm membrane reactor 0.2 1.26-4.42 COD = 64%, BOD 5 = 95%, TSS = 98%, TN = 79%, PO 4 -P = 91%, NH 4 -N = 78% - Higher biomass concentration, higher organic removal, lower hydraulic residence times, sound mixing and mass transfer, lower membrane fouling Manual monitoring is required.…”
Section: Opportunities For Greywater Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masmoudi Jabri et al. [ 159 ] compared the direct reuse of greywater to discharge into the environment followed by the same treatment on the scale of a residential building through LCA and found that reuse significantly decreased toxicity effects in the environment (by 1.6–16.2%) and eutrophication potential (by 17%). However, GHG emissions (by 2%) and human toxicity effects (by 51.8%) increased with greywater reuse.…”
Section: Opportunities For Greywater Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many water demands (i.e., gardening, car washing, floor cleaning, etc.) by institutions and university campuses can be achieved by low-cost treatment units [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%