“…Biocarriers can wash out of the reactor over time. [ 159 ] | Rotating biological contactor | 0.0043-0.3000 | 1.2 | COD = 84-89%, BOD 5 = 94%, TSS = 90%, TKN = 75% | 0.1 | Low operational cost, low technical personnel requirements, good organic removal | Limited removal of pathogens and extra filtration is often needed to filter biofilm particles. | [ 160 ] |
Gravity-driven membrane bioreactor | 0.0014-0.0029 | 0.02-0.04 | TOC = 80-95% | - | No backwashing or chemical and physical cleaning are required, and low energy requirement | Low permeate flux, membrane fouling | [ 161 ] |
Nano-filtration membrane treatment | 52 | 10 | COD = 98.0-99.7%, TOC = 97.7-99.6%, Salinity = 70%, SS = 100%, E. coli = 100% | 5-6 | Higher rejection efficiency, potent for the separation of small organic molecules, used in the desalination process | Prone to membrane fouling, high operating cost involves membrane cleaning, an energy-intensive process | [ 162 ] |
Moving bed biofilm membrane reactor | 0.2 | 1.26-4.42 | COD = 64%, BOD 5 = 95%, TSS = 98%, TN = 79%, PO 4 -P = 91%, NH 4 -N = 78% | - | Higher biomass concentration, higher organic removal, lower hydraulic residence times, sound mixing and mass transfer, lower membrane fouling | Manual monitoring is required. |
…”