2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of sintering process for carbon footprint and cost reduction: A comparative study for coke and biomass-derived sintering process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be achieved by optimizing the combustion process either through processing system improvements or utilizing more efficient technology, such as fluidized bed combustion [39]. Another way is to increase the energy density of the feed fuel by various pretreatment methods commonly used for biomass, such as briquetting [17,49] or fast pyrolysis [15]. Utilizing such improvements will further reduce the carbon footprint from higher heat utilization with similar levels of GHG emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be achieved by optimizing the combustion process either through processing system improvements or utilizing more efficient technology, such as fluidized bed combustion [39]. Another way is to increase the energy density of the feed fuel by various pretreatment methods commonly used for biomass, such as briquetting [17,49] or fast pyrolysis [15]. Utilizing such improvements will further reduce the carbon footprint from higher heat utilization with similar levels of GHG emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to ISO 14040, an LCA study can cater to various categories of environmental impacts, including resource use, human health and ecological consequences [46], which is commonly used as a decision-making support tool despite its limitations [49,50]. In this study, the impact is limited to the carbon footprint with GHG emissions as the output of the study measured in CO 2 equivalent.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron ore sintering process is one of the most energy-intensive and pollutant-emitting processes in the steel process, with significantly higher SO 2 , NO x , CO, CO 2 and dioxin emissions and energy consumption per ton of product than the pelletizing process. Today, global warming is forcing countries and regions around the world to develop carbon emission policies to reduce energy consumption and carbon footprint 136) , and the steel industry is a key target in this process, and accordingly, the environmental pressure on iron ore sintering production is becoming increasingly severe 137) . Sinter is still the most important charge for blast furnace ironmaking in some regions, and it is not possible to reduce iron ore sintering capacity on a large scale in a short period of time, so the main challenge at the development aspect is how to carry out efficient and stable production with limited or even mandatory carbon emissions and energy consumption to ensure the supply of ironmaking process.…”
Section: 1: Development Of Iron Ore Sintering Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another option to include biomass in the production route of ferrochromium is the replacement of coke or coal during the sintering operation to agglomerate chromite fines, which was already investigated several times recently for the sintering of iron ore [123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] and the pelletizing of iron ore [34,35,48,54,119,135]. However, there are also difficulties to overcome when charcoal is used for sintering.…”
Section: Pre-reduction and Agglomeration Of Chromium Resources Using Bio-based Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%