2017 International Conference on ENERGY and ENVIRONMENT (CIEM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ciem.2017.8120854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle environmental assessment of the production of rare earth elements from gold processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the key players, that is, regional blocs, governments, multinational companies, and regulators (on environmental and public health grounds and accountability), are to be seen as credible and in line with the key targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, then a fully-fledged framework of lifecycle sustainability assessments for REEs also needs to be developed and implemented. There is a range of studies on lifecycle assessments (LCAs) for (specific) REEs (and from specific sources and locations) available (see e.g., [92] for a recent systematic overview, and see [93,94]), but these are more narrowly focused on an at times limited set of environmental aspects (and typically also exclude human-health risks connected with toxicity), with differing underlying inventories and thus similar yet different outcomes (even when there are the same process chains). What they do not deliver is a more rounded sustainability assessment, which includes other corporate social responsibility (CSR) or now environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimensions (which include labor conditions and work safety, for instance), or an economic one with a trend and regulatory context analysis with a view to over-or under-supply and the investment interfaces.…”
Section: Future Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the key players, that is, regional blocs, governments, multinational companies, and regulators (on environmental and public health grounds and accountability), are to be seen as credible and in line with the key targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, then a fully-fledged framework of lifecycle sustainability assessments for REEs also needs to be developed and implemented. There is a range of studies on lifecycle assessments (LCAs) for (specific) REEs (and from specific sources and locations) available (see e.g., [92] for a recent systematic overview, and see [93,94]), but these are more narrowly focused on an at times limited set of environmental aspects (and typically also exclude human-health risks connected with toxicity), with differing underlying inventories and thus similar yet different outcomes (even when there are the same process chains). What they do not deliver is a more rounded sustainability assessment, which includes other corporate social responsibility (CSR) or now environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimensions (which include labor conditions and work safety, for instance), or an economic one with a trend and regulatory context analysis with a view to over-or under-supply and the investment interfaces.…”
Section: Future Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another definition is that tailings are fine-grained, particulate solids consisting of ground rock slurry, water, and chemical residues that remain after the minerals or commercial elements have been removed from the ore [7]. Thus, mine tailings and associated accidents have been identified as one of the most dangerous environmental problems worldwide [8]. Therefore, they are controlled by the mining companies because when there is a problem related to them, they can generate a negative and harmful environmental impact, which can be both immediate and long-term [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%