Life cycle environmental impacts and costs of beer production and consumption in the UK

Abstract

Purpose Global beer consumption is growing steadily and has recently reached 187.37 billion litres per year. The UK ranked 8th in the world, with 4.5 billion litres of beer produced annually. This paper considers life cycle environmental impacts and costs of beer production and consumption in the UK which are currently unknown. The analysis is carried out for two functional units: (i) production and consumption of 1 l of beer at home and (ii) annual production and consumption of beer in the UK. The system boundary is from cradle to grave. Methods Life cycle impacts have been estimated following the guidelines in ISO 14040/44; the methodology for life cycle costing is congruent with the LCA approach. Primary data have been obtained from a beer manufacturer; secondary data are sourced from the CCaLC, Ecoinvent and GaBi databases. GaBi 4.3 has been used for LCA modelling and the environmental impacts have been estimated according to the CML 2001 method. Results and discussion Depending on the type of packaging (glass bottles, aluminium and steel cans), 1 l of beer requires for example 10.3-17.5 MJ of primary energy and 41.2-41.8 l of water, emits 510-842 g of CO 2 eq. and has the life cycle costs of 12.72-14.37 pence. Extrapolating the results to the annual consumption of beer in the UK translates to a primary energy demand of over 49,600 TJ (0.56 % of UK primary energy consumption), water consumption of 1.85 bn hl (5.3 % of UK demand), emissions of 2.16 mt CO 2 eq. (0.85 % of UK emissions) and the life cycle costs of £553 million (3.2 % of UK beer market value). Production of raw materials is the main hotspot, contributing from 47 to 63 % to the impacts and 67 % to the life cycle costs. The packaging adds 19 to 46 % to the impacts and 13 % to the costs. Conclusions Beer in steel cans has the lowest impacts for five out of 12 impact categories considered: primary energy demand, depletion of abiotic resources, acidification, marine and freshwater toxicity. Bottled beer is the worst option for nine impact categories, including global warming and primary energy demand, but it has the lowest human toxicity potential. Beer in aluminium cans is the best option for ozone layer depletion and photochemical smog but has the highest human and marine toxicity potentials.

Evaluating the Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Craft Beer Industry: An Assessment of Challenges and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Accounting

“…Of particular focus here are studies that involved brewery inputs and outputs. Amienyo & Azapagic produced a United Kingdom brewery company case study that calculated GHGs using process mapping, inventory data from the case company, global warming potentials of GHG emissions, and data approximations where direct measurements were not available along the value chain [21]. The key findings were that packaging comprised the majority of GHGs for beer production, with 50% of GHGs for beer in glass bottles, and 35% for steel cans [21].…”

“…Until a recently published study by Cimini & Moresi, there was no research that applied the same methodology to compare the carbon footprints of small, medium, and large breweries in one study [18]. Previous to Cimini & Moresi's study, studies calculated the carbon footprint of beer from a range of brewery sizes, and have primarily involved case studies in the United Kingdom, the USA, and Italy (among other European studies) [5,7,[18][19][20][21]. A lack of Canadian-based research supports this study and its contribution to a geographically-specific case study.…”

Beer-brewing powered by controlled hydrodynamic cavitation: Theory and real-scale experiments

“…The primary energy utilization over the whole life cycle of beer production, from barley malting to filling and other processes, has recently been estimated in the range 1-1.7 GJ per hectoliter of the final product (Amienyo and Azapagic, 2016), with typical electricity demand of modern breweries on average around 25-30% of the overall energy requirements (Kubule et al, 2016).…”

Influence of Peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) Fruit Addition on Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Activities of Beer

“…Beer is one of the most widely consumed alcoholic beverages around the world (Amienyo and Azapagic, 2016). Although it is one of the oldest beverages, the basic ingredients of beer water, malt or grains, hops and yeasts, and production methods have not been much changed over centuries (Ambrosi et al, 2014;Pires and Brányik, 2015).…”