Life Cycle Environmental Sustainability and Energy Assessment of Timber Wall Construction: A Comprehensive Overview

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive overview of the life cycle environmental and energy assessment for all residential and commercial constructions made of timber walls, globally. The study was carried out based on a systematic literature analysis conducted on the Scopus database. A total of 66 research articles were relevant to timber wall design. Among these, the residential construction sector received more attention than the commercial sector, while the low-rise construction (1–2 stories) gained more attention than high-rise construction (>5 stories). Most of these studies were conducted in Canada, Europe, Malaysia, and the USA. In addition, the end-of-life phase received limited attention compared to upstream phases in most of the studies. We compared all environmental and energy-based life cycle impacts that used “m2” as the functional unit; this group represented 21 research articles. Global warming potential was understandably the most studied life cycle environmental impact category followed by acidification, eutrophication, embodied energy, photochemical oxidation, and abiotic depletion. In terms of global warming impact, the external walls of low-rise buildings emit 18 to 702 kg CO2 kg eq./m2, while the internal walls of the same emit 11 kg CO2 kg eq./m2. In turn, the walls of high-rise buildings carry 114.3 to 227.3 kg CO2 kg eq./m2 in terms of global warming impact. The review highlights variations in timber wall designs and the environmental impact of these variations, together with different system boundaries and varying building lifetimes, as covered in various articles. Finally, a few recommendations have been offered at the end of the article for future researchers of this domain.

Color Authenticity for the Sustainable Development of Historical Areas: A Case Study of Shiquan

“…The comparative analysis of the comprehensive sample photos also confirmed this result. The colors of the cluster was regarded as a relatively small proportion of environmental colors, including traditional Chinese colors such as "brown-yellow (39, 100, 68)" (Zonghuang), "dim yellow (40, 68, 78)" (Hunhuang), and "golden black (45,59,65)" (Wujin), which provided references for selecting the colors for other environmental elements in historic areas.…”

Ecological Potential of Building Components in Multi-Storey Residential Construction: A Comparative Case Study between an Existing Concrete and a Timber Building in Austria

“…The main objective is to find out which of the building components used in the two compared buildings are responsible for the greatest embodied environmental impacts and whether there are any differences between the two construction methods in this respect. This ranking of building elements is a novelty as previously most comparisons have been made between specific building elements, such as exterior walls [23][24][25][26], non load-bearing interior walls [27,28] or flooring systems [19,29]. LCAs of whole buildings, on the other hand, have often only looked at individual parameters, such as GWP or energy demand.…”

Life cycle environmental sustainability and cumulative energy assessment of biomass pellets biofuel derived from agroforest residues

“…Their use is tempting since they are not linked to indirectly or directly land use alters issues, and which are by-products of current processes, they are expected to be low-cost. Many economic evaluation models suggest that residues could be a key source of energy in the future, especially in a scenario with severe climate alleviation [12,13]. Bioenergy consumption results in limited allowed land usage, less biodiversity, and other ecological impacts, and lower overall climate change [14,15].…”