2021
DOI: 10.3390/batteries7030057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Cycle Modelling of Extraction and Processing of Battery Minerals—A Parametric Approach

Abstract: Sustainable battery production with low environmental footprints requires a systematic assessment of the entire value chain, from raw material extraction and processing to battery production and recycling. In order to explore and understand the variations observed in the reported footprints of raw battery materials, it is vital to re-assess the footprints of these material value chains. Identifying the causes of these variations by combining engineering and environmental system analysis expands our knowledge o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, to harvest the highest emissions reduction potential it is essential to ensure that all these activities are performed in the most environmentally sound way. While the last stage of the battery production value chain could be rather straightforward to decarbonize due to the possibility of producing the cells with renewable energy sources, there are significantly more challenges related to the value chain of the primary materials used in LIBs, as the impact across the value chains is affected by several parameters [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to harvest the highest emissions reduction potential it is essential to ensure that all these activities are performed in the most environmentally sound way. While the last stage of the battery production value chain could be rather straightforward to decarbonize due to the possibility of producing the cells with renewable energy sources, there are significantly more challenges related to the value chain of the primary materials used in LIBs, as the impact across the value chains is affected by several parameters [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60–80% of synthetic graphite consumed in the U.S. was produced domestically . However, higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ,, and higher costs of synthetic graphite compared to natural graphite inhibit its competitive advantages. In addition, because it has high porosity, synthetic graphite is not suitable for refractories and foundries .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results convey insights into how changes in the lever settings yield variations in the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the raw materials leading towards a more reliable LCA of LIBs. 42 The studies published by Ellingsen et al 43 and Crenna et al 44 compare LCIs of LIBs and identify key assumptions and differences in existing LCA studies to enhance transparency in the underlying assumptions and results obtained. To reduce the previous ranges of 50-500 kg CO 2 eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the environmental impacts of LIBs are dependent on where in the world the battery is produced and where the materials are sourced. The study of Manjong et al 42 also identifies the sources of variabilities (levers) by disaggregating the value chains of six raw battery materials (aluminium, copper, graphite, lithium carbonate, manganese, and nickel). The results convey insights into how changes in the lever settings yield variations in the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the raw materials leading towards a more reliable LCA of LIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%