2009
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbp020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle traits of two transatlantic populations of Eurytemora affinis (Copepoda: Calanoida): salinity effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The clutch size in this species reaches 75 eggs clutch −1 (Beyrend-Dur et al 2009), which explains the stronger (compared to our data) difference between sinking speeds of nonovigerous and brooding females. Hence, the cost of the egg-brooding strategy in comparison with the broadcast strategy is likely to be increased due to energy demands for sustained locomotion and increased predation on adult females, since the large egg masses can cause a decrease in swimming speed (Seuront 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Salinity On Egg Mass Densitycontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The clutch size in this species reaches 75 eggs clutch −1 (Beyrend-Dur et al 2009), which explains the stronger (compared to our data) difference between sinking speeds of nonovigerous and brooding females. Hence, the cost of the egg-brooding strategy in comparison with the broadcast strategy is likely to be increased due to energy demands for sustained locomotion and increased predation on adult females, since the large egg masses can cause a decrease in swimming speed (Seuront 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Salinity On Egg Mass Densitycontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Furthermore, differences in host susceptibility (Glover et al 2003, Glover & Skaala 2006) may also influence groups of lice. Studies conducted on other marine copepods have revealed significant genetic variation among populations despite a high potential for dispersal (Bucklin et al 2000, Oines & Heuch 2007, Nuwer et al 2008, and population-specific adaptations to salinity have been documented (Beyrend-Dur et al 2009). Additionally, some copepod studies have revealed cryptic species as opposed to populations (Lee 2000, Chen & Hare 2008, as evidenced by reproductive incompatibility (Lee 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies of marine copepods have shown that copepods were always limited by food in the field (Checkley, 1980;Durbin et al, 1983) and egg production was immediately limited by phytoplankton availability (Checkley, 1980). Many studies have focused on the effect of single environmental factors, such as temperature, food or salinity, on estuarine copepods (Vuorinen et al, 1998;Cervetto, Gaudy & Pagano, 1999;Ishikawa, Ban & Shiga, 1999;Lee & Petersen, 2002;Beyrend-Dur et al, 2009), or even on the combined effect of temperature and salinity (Roddie, Leakey & Berry, 1984;Chinnery & Williams, 2004;Devreker, Souissi & Seuront, 2004;Holste & Peck, 2005;Devreker et al, 2007Devreker et al, , 2009Beyrend-Dur et al, 2011). Although previous studies have shown that growth and egg production of some copepod species were more sensitive to food shortage than to temperature variation (Ban, 1994;Koski & Kuosa, 1999), few studies have dealt with the combined effect of these environmental factors on copepod development, growth and reproduction (Klein Breteler & Gonzalez, 1986;Koski & Kuosa, 1999;Cook et al, 2007;Jim enez-Melero et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%