Life Domains, Constraints, Motivations, and Intimate Partner Violence: Assessing the Generality of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency

Abstract

Given the victim-offender overlap, it has been suggested that every theory about offenders implies a corresponding theory of victimization. We assess the above assertion concerning Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency within the context of intimate partner violence (IPV). Drawing data from the International Dating Violence Study, we examine the direct and indirect effects of the self, family, school/work, and peer domains on IPV perpetration and victimization. We found the four life domains significantly predicted both IPV perpetration and victimization and their effects on both outcome variables were mediated by the constraint and motivation factors. Our results indicate that the mechanisms that account for offending posited in Agnew’s perspective appear to be equally relevant and applicable for understanding victimization.

Violations of Emergent Norms Regarding COVID-19 Mitigation and Social Hygiene: An Application of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime

“…While previous studies highlight the direct effects of the various life domains on criminal offending, only a few tests examine the indirect effects of life domains ( Cochran, 2017 ; Ngo et al, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2012 ), with most studies utilizing a sample gathered in the USA (cf. Kabiri et al, 2020 ; Muftić et al, 2014 ).…”

“… Kabiri et al, 2020 ; Muftić et al, 2014 ). Ngo et al (2022) conducted the most recent test of Agnew’s theory on the perpetration of intimate partner violence. The study, like most prior tests, provides support for the theory’s propositions: life domains have a direct and indirect effect on offending.…”