2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life expectancy in older adults with advanced cancer: Evaluation of a geriatric assessment-based prognostic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, new prognostic scoring systems have been devised and/or validated (Table 2) 16▪,18,23,24,28,40–62. These models often incorporate additional symptoms or laboratory values, which may be independent prognostic factors, to enhance the predictive power of the existing scoring systems.…”
Section: Instruments Available To Make a Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, new prognostic scoring systems have been devised and/or validated (Table 2) 16▪,18,23,24,28,40–62. These models often incorporate additional symptoms or laboratory values, which may be independent prognostic factors, to enhance the predictive power of the existing scoring systems.…”
Section: Instruments Available To Make a Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA and management of identified deficits has been shown to decrease moderate to severe chemotherapy toxicity and improve completion rates of chemotherapy. It may also result in improved quality of life in those receiving systemic therapy [4][5][6][7]. Studies have shown that GA can be completed through self-administered surveys and/or electronically with minimal involvement from clinic staff other than for cognitive and objective physical functioning testing [8,9].…”
Section: Oncologic Assessment In Older Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5-8 Further work in this same sample of patients by Lund et al examined the life expectancy in older adults with advanced cancer through the evaluation of a GA-based prognostic model. 9 To conduct the analysis Lund et al obtained patients’ vital status and date of death or end of follow-up data from the study forms, and this was subsequently verified by the patients’ community oncology practice. As part of the COACH study, survival was only assessed up to 1 year following enrollment onto the study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%