1996
DOI: 10.2307/3546194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life History Plasticity: Influence of Photoperiod on Growth and Development in the Common Blue Butterfly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
107
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most valuable conclusions from recent work is that, just as trade-offs may be restricted to stressful situations in the laboratory (see above), whether seasonal time is limited or not-"time stress"-determines the structure of potential trade-offs. For example, when short photoperiods signal that the end of the season is approaching, development may accelerate in order to allow safe entry into diapause before the winter, or to allow emergence in time for reproduction, with varying influences on size and growth rate (Carrière et al, 1996;Leimar, 1996;Gotthard, 1998Gotthard, , 2001Nylin and Gotthard, 1998;Gotthard et al, 1999Gotthard et al, , 2000De Block and Stoks, 2004). When resources are limited, some species reduce developmental time with the same growth rate and so reduce size; others reduce size somewhat but maintain the same duration of development; yet others take longer to develop, but maintain size.…”
Section: Trade-offs and Developmental Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most valuable conclusions from recent work is that, just as trade-offs may be restricted to stressful situations in the laboratory (see above), whether seasonal time is limited or not-"time stress"-determines the structure of potential trade-offs. For example, when short photoperiods signal that the end of the season is approaching, development may accelerate in order to allow safe entry into diapause before the winter, or to allow emergence in time for reproduction, with varying influences on size and growth rate (Carrière et al, 1996;Leimar, 1996;Gotthard, 1998Gotthard, , 2001Nylin and Gotthard, 1998;Gotthard et al, 1999Gotthard et al, , 2000De Block and Stoks, 2004). When resources are limited, some species reduce developmental time with the same growth rate and so reduce size; others reduce size somewhat but maintain the same duration of development; yet others take longer to develop, but maintain size.…”
Section: Trade-offs and Developmental Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When confronted with such seasonal time constraints, free-living organisms with complex life cycles are often able to increase their growth rate and/or decrease their transitional size so as to switch habitats before conditions deteriorate (e.g. Leimar, 1996 ;Johansson and Rowe, 1999 ;Margraf et al 2003). Seasonal time constraints are also common in parasite life cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, todavía existe un vacío de información empírica básica que per mita hacer estimaciones cuantitativas de cómo la adecuación biológica depende del tamaño corporal, de las tasas iniciales de crecimiento (i.e., de crías o jóvenes) y del tiempo de desarrollo, bajo diferentes escenarios ecológicos o genéticos (Abrams et al 1996, Leimar 1996, Blanckenhorn 2000. Desafor tunadamente, estas estimaciones todavía son difíciles de obtener, además de la presencia de una fuer te variación de las mismas entre los organismos.…”
Section: Crecimiento Corporal Entre Años Y Estacionesunclassified