Life over Literature; or, Whatever Happened to Critical Biography?

Haffenden, John

doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26548-0_2

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The title of the second part of her biography, Eliot's New flatter self-esteem, to propound opinion, to influence and manipulate others; the notion that they are more honest and open than other forms of writing is plainly absurd." 8 Eliot's letters must be interpreted with tact; they are no less rhetorical constructions than his other writings and cannot be straightforward evidence of the poet's personal experience. Haffenden, as general editor of the Letters of T. S. Eliot, has revised his opinion of the significance of these missives, now "all the very best building blocks of a biography" (L5 xxxiii) and yet his earlier misgivings about the epistolary form should not be discarded.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The new Cambridge companion to T. S. Eliot

Davies

2018

Textual Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1927, T. S. Eliot told the Shakespeare Association: "About anyone so great as Shakespeare, it is probable that we can never be right; and if we can never be right, it is better that we should from time to time change our way of being wrong" (CP3 245). In this lecture, Eliot wittily disposes of several "up-to-date" Shakespeares proposed by contemporary critics. His gesture reveals an awareness of the difficulties of addressing a scholarly audience on the subject of the most studied author in the English language. Eliot's approach to the canon was often marked by iconoclasm:Hamlet was judged "most certainly an artistic failure"; Milton "writes English like a dead language"; Shelley was "humourless, pedantic, self-centred"; Tennyson's poetry is condescendingly placed as "beautiful but dull." 1 These extravagant judgements are indicative of an anxiety about the potentially numbing dead weight of canonical reputations. For today's readers of Eliot, seeking fresh interpretations of his work, the challenge that "we should from time to time change our minds" (CP3 245) is no less daunting than the position that confronted Eliot when he addressed the Shakespeare Association.The relationship of an author's life to his work is crucial in reassessing Eliot's achievement as a poet, critic and dramatist but can require a certain amount of careful 2 unravelling or untangling of the received opinions that have shaped his reputation. In "Tradition and the Individual Talent" (1919), Eliot famously claims "the more perfect the artist, the more completely separate in him will be the man who suffers and the mind which creates." He advances an "Impersonal theory of poetry" (CP2 109, 108).However, many critics have ignored Eliot's own separation of poet and poems. Ezra Pound contended that Eliot "arrived at the supreme Eminence among English critics largely through disguising himself as a corpse." 2 Pound felt that Possum's pontifical authority camouflaged the avant-garde affront to conventional taste represented byThe Waste Land. By contrast, Helen Gardner's The Art of T. S. Eliot (1949), a book which Eliot recommended as the best study of his poetry, placed the emphasis on Four Quartets, characterized as the work of a devout Anglican. In a discussion of Eliot's later poetry, Gardner remarked: "Nobody can underrate the momentousness for any mature person of acceptance of all that membership of the Christian Church entails." 3 Hugh Kenner's sophisticated study The Invisible Poet: T. S. Eliot (1959) Life, alluding to Dante's Vita Nuova or new life, suggests the passing of a spiritual watershed when Eliot became a practising Christian. In the words of the King James Bible: "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold all things become new" (2 Corinthians 5:17). Although assiduously researched, Gordon's teleology of a spiritual pilgrimage, sketching the paradigm of Saint Augustine's exemplary self-reflexive narrative of spiritual autobiography, has not pleased all literary critics. In pa...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The new Cambridge companion to T. S. Eliot

Davies

2018

Textual Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…7 Haffenden countered: "letters may be used to 4 flatter self-esteem, to propound opinion, to influence and manipulate others; the notion that they are more honest and open than other forms of writing is plainly absurd." 8 Eliot's letters must be interpreted with tact; they are no less rhetorical constructions than his other writings and cannot be straightforward evidence of the poet's personal experience. Haffenden, as general editor of the Letters of T. S. Eliot, has revised his opinion of the significance of these missives, now "all the very best building blocks of a biography" (L5 xxxiii) and yet his earlier misgivings about the epistolary form should not be discarded.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The New Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot

Harding¹

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

show abstract

Life over Literature; or, Whatever Happened to Critical Biography?

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

The new Cambridge companion to T. S. Eliot

The new Cambridge companion to T. S. Eliot

The New Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About