Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose: of the study is to identify factors that hinder budget support for investment projects aimed at combating poverty due to the deprivation of economically accessible social infrastructure (deprivation poverty).Methods: the work used traditional methods of scientific analysis, as well as an interdisciplinary approach characteristic of the study of social well-being problems in the context of the availability of social benefits created by social infrastructure facilities. The research is based on the application of social goal-setting documents, methodological documents regulating investment activities and budget support, Rosstat data, EIS «Procurement», EMISS, GIS «Electronic Budget».Results: the identification of factors of social well-being was carried out and the justification of the level of deprivation poverty in relation to the available social infrastructure was carried out. The necessity of independent regulation of the market of the poor suffering from such deprivations is confirmed. Based on the analysis of methodological tools for assessing the feasibility of budgetary support for investment projects in social infrastructure, methodological problems have been identified and the inapplicability of the existing approach for the market under study have been proved. Proposals are formulated to change approaches to calculating the budgetary efficiency of investment projects aimed at the infrastructural development of social industries.Conclusions and Relevance: a growing number of the deprived poor are suffering from a lack of supply of economically accessible social infrastructure and services. The study shows that the involvement of private investment in the creation of such facilities, taking into account the need for non-market pricing, will require changes in the methodological approach of the state to budget support for investment projects. It is necessary to abandon the percentage and return principles and replace them with compensatory ones for servicing vulnerable categories. The social development of the country should be based on the social well-being of all segments of the population, without extreme gaps among them. For sustainable development, flexible methodological tools are needed, based on the dependence of the amount of budget support on the number of social effects generated by the project.
Purpose: of the study is to identify factors that hinder budget support for investment projects aimed at combating poverty due to the deprivation of economically accessible social infrastructure (deprivation poverty).Methods: the work used traditional methods of scientific analysis, as well as an interdisciplinary approach characteristic of the study of social well-being problems in the context of the availability of social benefits created by social infrastructure facilities. The research is based on the application of social goal-setting documents, methodological documents regulating investment activities and budget support, Rosstat data, EIS «Procurement», EMISS, GIS «Electronic Budget».Results: the identification of factors of social well-being was carried out and the justification of the level of deprivation poverty in relation to the available social infrastructure was carried out. The necessity of independent regulation of the market of the poor suffering from such deprivations is confirmed. Based on the analysis of methodological tools for assessing the feasibility of budgetary support for investment projects in social infrastructure, methodological problems have been identified and the inapplicability of the existing approach for the market under study have been proved. Proposals are formulated to change approaches to calculating the budgetary efficiency of investment projects aimed at the infrastructural development of social industries.Conclusions and Relevance: a growing number of the deprived poor are suffering from a lack of supply of economically accessible social infrastructure and services. The study shows that the involvement of private investment in the creation of such facilities, taking into account the need for non-market pricing, will require changes in the methodological approach of the state to budget support for investment projects. It is necessary to abandon the percentage and return principles and replace them with compensatory ones for servicing vulnerable categories. The social development of the country should be based on the social well-being of all segments of the population, without extreme gaps among them. For sustainable development, flexible methodological tools are needed, based on the dependence of the amount of budget support on the number of social effects generated by the project.
In the practice of sociological research, the growth of interest in various aspects of social behavior is the higher the more acute the crisis period and uncertainty of reality. Today, adherence to life guidelines, resistance to various challenges, flexibility in the strategies of social behavior acquire the status of a key competitive advantage in ensuring stability, security and development of Russian society. The relevance of the topic is due to the demand for the development of new approaches to the analysis of social behavior, which will allow to take into account not only the objective conditions of people’s lives, but also their subjective ideas about the desired future. The article substantiates the conceptualization of the concepts of plans and reality in the horizon of near and far planning of life goals within the boundaries of the methodology of studying social behavior. The author’s model of analysis of social behavior strategy choice allows taking into account not only rational but also axiological aspects of social behavior, as well as its relationship with life strategies, motivation, and beliefs. The empirical base is the data obtained in the course of nationwide studies conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the period 2015–2024. The conceptual model is tested through the comparison of perceptions of the spheres of desired and actually achieved success in the realization of life goals through the characteristics of the length of the planning horizon and the perception of their future. The analysis of dynamics showed that family, work, personal well-being constitute the core of perceptions of success and, as a consequence, the motivation of achievement and the formation of the image of the future. Negative trends were revealed: a structural shift in the assessment of the importance of education, a high gap between plans and real prospects for professional realization. The height of social barriers in the spheres of labor market and material well-being remains significant for a significant part of respondents. In terms of personal future planning horizon, stable trends were found: in assessing their current situation among those who have plans for the future there are twice as many who assess it as good; the share of those who have achieved or achieved a lot is also higher among those who have plans than among those who do not make plans at all. An additional angle of analysis through the criterion of planning horizon length serves as a meaningful measure of proactivity of social behavior, manifestation of values and perceptions in specific actions. The results of the study can be useful for sociologists studying social behavior, as well as for specialists working in the field of social psychology, social management and forecasting; they can contribute to the development of new methods for analyzing social behavior, taking into account its subjective component.
This article examines approaches towards studying generations. Millenials are highlighted as a specific object of research. Given their considerable inner diversity and non-uniformity, Russian millenials can be considered to be a holistic generation, which differs from elder generations in terms of social orientations and behavioral characteristics. The social self-identification of Russian millenials is examined, while identity criteria for various youth groups are defined. It is revealed that their self-assessment of status is considerably elevated when compared to elder generations, the former being based on somewhat different criteria. Despite the fact that material well-being, as is the case with elder generations, plays a key role in self-evaluation of status, millenials’ self-identification is also based on education level and professional status, which might indicate their willingness to accept the values of a meritocratic society. Millenials’ social capital is developed using sources provided by the new information-communication environment, with said sources being more diverse and attainable than ever before. Thanks to these new opportunities for developing social capital, the latter can be used much more efficiently in various environments. Millenials declare their high degree of solidarity with elder generations, while accepting a considerable amount of monetary and non-monetary assistance from the latter. Meanwhile they are extremely sympathetic to various forms of charity and volunteerism, while often participating in such activity themselves. In general, you can say that millenials are rather tightly linked to the system of social exchanges, while being prepared to assume the role of independent subjects of social activity. This article is based on data from a study titled “Differentiation of youth groups: economic activity, demographic behavior, social practices”, conducted by the Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting (Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration) in 2019. The sample, which represents Russia’s population from age 18 to 35, consisted of 3.5 thousand respondents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.