2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65813-1_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LifeCLEF 2017 Lab Overview: Multimedia Species Identification Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automating the analysis process to identify and classify the data has therefore become necessary and deep learning methods have proven to be an effective solution. In fact, all top methods from the LifeCLEF 2017 contest, an event that aims to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art identification tools for biological data, were based on deep learning 21 . CNNs have already successfully been used to identify plants from images of their leaves 22,23 and digitized images of herbaria 24 .…”
Section: Identification and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automating the analysis process to identify and classify the data has therefore become necessary and deep learning methods have proven to be an effective solution. In fact, all top methods from the LifeCLEF 2017 contest, an event that aims to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art identification tools for biological data, were based on deep learning 21 . CNNs have already successfully been used to identify plants from images of their leaves 22,23 and digitized images of herbaria 24 .…”
Section: Identification and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an increasing interest in applying computer vision to agriculture, a number of data sets dedicated to plants have been released (Giselsson, Dyrmann, Jørgensen, Jensen, & Midtiby, 2017;Haug & Ostermann, 2015;Minervini, Fischbach, Scharr, & Tsaftaris, 2016;Mureşan & Oltean, 2018;Sa et al, 2016). Notably, the PlantCLEF (Joly et al, 2017) data set spans many species of plant. While robotics benefits from developments in computer vision and machine learning, the domain of data used in these communities is unlikely to properly represent the specific nature of robotics applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated approaches, such as computer vision and machine learning methods, can complement valuable citizen science data and may help bridge the “annotation gap” (Unger et al., ) between existing data and research‐ready data sets. Deep learning approaches, in particular, have been recently shown to achieve impressive performance on a variety of predictive tasks such as species identification (Joly et al., ; Wäldchen et al., ), plant trait recognition (Younis et al., ), plant species distribution modeling (Botella et al., ), and weed detection (Milioto et al., ). Carranza‐Rojas et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%