2005
DOI: 10.2190/7h5p-2ahj-l34q-gw9u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifespan Differences in the Social Networks of Prison Inmates

Abstract: Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (SST) (Carstensen, 1992, 1993) accounts for lifespan changes in human social networks and for the motivations which underlie those changes. SST is applied in this research with 256 prison inmates and non-inmates, ages 18-84, from Mississippi, Kansas, and New Mexico. Two research questions sought to identify (a) whether inmate networks change in size, and (b) whether overall closeness within an inmate's network changes over the adult years. Results indicate that older inmates, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social network affi liations and provisions of older male prisoners have been reported to closely resemble that of older noninmate populations ( Bond, Thompson, & Malloy, 2005 ). For instance, older male prisoners are able to maintain smaller yet emotionally fulfi lling social relationships despite imprisonment ( Bond et al, 2005 ). This explanation for the mediating roles both of forgiveness and SPS is further strengthened by the study ' s third and fourth fi nding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social network affi liations and provisions of older male prisoners have been reported to closely resemble that of older noninmate populations ( Bond, Thompson, & Malloy, 2005 ). For instance, older male prisoners are able to maintain smaller yet emotionally fulfi lling social relationships despite imprisonment ( Bond et al, 2005 ). This explanation for the mediating roles both of forgiveness and SPS is further strengthened by the study ' s third and fourth fi nding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Based on previously reviewed literature, forgiveness is likely to mitigate an individual ' s negative affect, cognition, and behaviors that would otherwise deteriorate social network affi liation and frequency of network contact. Social network affi liations and provisions of older male prisoners have been reported to closely resemble that of older noninmate populations ( Bond, Thompson, & Malloy, 2005 ). For instance, older male prisoners are able to maintain smaller yet emotionally fulfi lling social relationships despite imprisonment ( Bond et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However generally prison social networks appear to diminish with age (Bond, Thompson, & Malloy, 2005). In the absence of a supportive social milieu, isolation poses significant difficulties for some older prisoners (Aday & Krabill, 2012;Crawley, 2005), and the accompanying loneliness has been found to be significantly associated with psychological distress among this group (Gallagher, 1988).…”
Section: Social Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Older prisoners are at a greater risk of becoming isolated within the prison environment and are less likely to have social support, putting them at a greater risk of developing mental health difficulties. 29 In the aforementioned study by Kingston et al, 3 half of prisoners in the sample (n=60) were identified as having a mental disorder, with depression being the most frequently diagnosed. Furthermore, 12% (n=15) had symptoms of cognitive impairment.…”
Section: 28mentioning
confidence: 98%