2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime cardiovascular risk is associated with a multimarker score of systemic oxidative status in young adults independently of traditional risk factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While patients with SCAD are considered to be at high CVR, this can be controlled with appropriate pharmacological and lifestyle management [19]. Moreover, our group previously described that the systemic oxidative stress of young subjects with SCAD is similar to that of subjects with low-lifetime CVR [14]. All the subjects with SCAD in our cohort were on statin treatment, which is known to reduce the levels of oxLDL [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While patients with SCAD are considered to be at high CVR, this can be controlled with appropriate pharmacological and lifestyle management [19]. Moreover, our group previously described that the systemic oxidative stress of young subjects with SCAD is similar to that of subjects with low-lifetime CVR [14]. All the subjects with SCAD in our cohort were on statin treatment, which is known to reduce the levels of oxLDL [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Those subjects with a recent cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction or angina in the last 3 years) that was stable and well-controlled on medical therapy were classified as having stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) (N = 23). The remaining participants were classified according to their estimated lifetime CVR using the QRisk-lifetime estimator-including age, sex, ethnicity, diabetes mellitus, family history of angina or heart attack, chronic kidney disease, blood pressure treatment, atrial fibrillation, rheumatoid arthritis, smoking status, cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, systolic blood pressure and BMI [13]-into those with low-lifetime CVR (<26%, N = 22) or high-lifetime CVR (>26%, N = 21) [14].…”
Section: Human Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most published studies malondialdehyde is measured as a marker of lipid peroxidation. Given that dialysis patients are at high risk for cardiovascular complications and atherosclerosis [32] and that oxLDL as a marker of lipid peroxidation is tightly associated with atherosclerosis [33] and cardiovascular risk [21], we considered that oxLDL would better reflect the oxidative status on lipids of dialysis patients. In this sense, our results support that lipid peroxidation is likely the leading cause of the increase in oxidative stress post-dialysis, and indicates that the high risk of developing atherosclerosis in dialysis might be caused in part by the dialysis treatment itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomarkers of oxidative damage and antioxidant defense were combined in a multimarker score of oxidative damage (OxyScore) and antioxidant defense (AntioxyScore), respectively, as described [20,21]. Protein carbonyls, oxLDL, 8-OHdG, and XOD activity were standardized using the pre-dialysis group as a reference for the OxyScore.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodríguez-Sánchez, et al [6] carried out an innovative study in which they evaluated the cardiovascular risk associated with lifelong organic oxidative stress in adults and young people, independently of traditional risk factors, by calculating multiple ROS levels and cardiovascular risk scores, finding that in the young adult population (30 to 50 years) with no history of a cardiovascular event, oxidative stress levels were relatively similar to those with a history of the event, and/or with established coronary artery disease, and therefore the risk of the "healthy" group was high [6]. This may indicate an abysmal underestimation of cardiovascular risk with the use of simple cardiovascular risk scores, which must be taken into account in the clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%