2019
DOI: 10.1086/704156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime Fitness, Sex-Specific Life History, and the Maintenance of a Polyphenism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…differences in body colour and wing development) or alternative reproductive tactics because morphs or tactics are likely to be affected by different extrinsic factors related to resource acquisition or intrinsic processes causing resource allocation trade‐offs (e.g. Schuett et al., 2015; but see Lackey et al., 2019). For example, in the colour‐dimorphic pea aphid A. pisum , the individual‐level correlation between lifespan and early reproductive investment differs between morphs even when the average values of life‐history traits do not differ between morphs (Schuett et al., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences in body colour and wing development) or alternative reproductive tactics because morphs or tactics are likely to be affected by different extrinsic factors related to resource acquisition or intrinsic processes causing resource allocation trade‐offs (e.g. Schuett et al., 2015; but see Lackey et al., 2019). For example, in the colour‐dimorphic pea aphid A. pisum , the individual‐level correlation between lifespan and early reproductive investment differs between morphs even when the average values of life‐history traits do not differ between morphs (Schuett et al., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In palmate newts, considering larger time‐scales, the potential advantages of progenesis in terms of the exploitation of underused resources and earlier reproduction may be counterbalanced by the episodes of drought, favouring metamorphosis, and conditioning the long‐term persistence of progenesis as a polyphenism in these populations (Oromi et al., 2016). Ultimately, only measures of lifetime fitness may allow to decipher between the different factors that may interact in complex ways to influence the success of alternative developmental strategies (Lackey et al., 2019), and identify all the potential costs of progenesis (see also Denoël, Drapeau, Oromi, et al., 2019). Future research on facultative progenesis in this system should aim to address these remaining questions to precise the strength of the ‘trophic advantage of progenesis’ hypothesis along newts lifetime and its role in its success and the long‐term persistence of the polyphenism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, stable isotope analysis also revealed a lower effect of body size reduction on niche differentiation via progenesis within males than within females. This may constitute a sex‐specific cost of progenesis (Denoël, Drapeau, Winandy, 2019; Lackey et al., 2019; Whiteman, 1997) concurring to explain the low occurrence of progenetic males in palmate newt populations of the Larzac Plateau (Denoël, Drapeau, Winandy, 2019; Mathiron et al., 2017). This effect would add to another disadvantage of progenetic male newts, which are less sexually active than coexisting metamorphic males (Denoël, Drapeau, Winandy, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies have developed organizational frameworks for animal life history traits and consequently reveal generalities in life history trade-offs (Pianka, 1970;Pianka et al, 2017;Winemiller et al, 2015), such as the differences between fast strategies (classic r-selected species; early maturity, short lifespans, high reproductive output) and slow strategies (classic K-selected species; late maturity, long lifespans, low reproductive output; Cayuela et al, 2016aCayuela et al, , 2017Healy et al, 2019). Trade-offs in reproductive traits have also been well-documented given the energetic difference for reproduction between males and females (Cayuela et al, 2014(Cayuela et al, , 2016bGrayson et al, 2011;Lackey et al, 2019;Roff & Fairbairn, 1991;Trivers, 1972;Whiteman, 1997). Unsurprisingly, variability and stability of the environment is a primary driver of these life history trade-offs across many animal groups (Cayuela et al, 2017(Cayuela et al, , 2019Mims & Olden, 2012;Pianka, 1970;Townsend & Hildrew, 1994;Winemiller & Rose, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%