2000
DOI: 10.1177/00220345000790020501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime-limiting Strength Degradation from Contact Fatigue in Dental Ceramics

Abstract: The hypothesis under examination in this paper is that the lifetimes of dental restorations are limited by the accumulation of contact damage during oral function; and, moreover, that strengths of dental ceramics are significantly lower after multi-cycle loading than after single-cycle loading. Accordingly, indentation damage and associated strength degradation from multi-cycle contacts with spherical indenters in water are evaluated in four dental ceramics: "aesthetic" ceramics-porcelain and micaceous glass-c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
124
1
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
124
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…SCG of various dental ceramics has been investigated using cyclic, static, and dynamic loading methods [7,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Analyzing the SCG for both veneer and core components of the same all-ceramic system would enable lifetime prediction using finite element models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCG of various dental ceramics has been investigated using cyclic, static, and dynamic loading methods [7,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Analyzing the SCG for both veneer and core components of the same all-ceramic system would enable lifetime prediction using finite element models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 In terms of in vivo loading, the masticatory cycle consists of a combination of vertical and lateral forces, subjecting the restoration to a variety of off-axis loading forces. 31 However, it was the intention of the current study to give an indication as to whether or not the proposed minimal design would provide inlays with a similar structural integrity to traditionally prepared CEREC inlays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the degradation mechanisms can be divided into four categories: mechanical processes, chemical reactions, biological degradation [Gu et al, 1998], and radiation [Kaplan, 1989]. For mechanical processes, the performance of materials can be affected adversely by fatigue [Jung et al, 2000], pressure loading [Rajagopal et al, 2007], and swelling of solid mixtures [Buonsanti et al, 2011]. Examples of chemical degradation include humid and alkaline effects [Björk et al, 2003], exposure to chlorides and carbon-dioxide [Glasser et al, 2008], and calcium leaching [Gawin et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%