1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.57.4204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime measurements of cesium5d2D5/2,3/2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
35
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical values differ substantially, by over 5%, from the experimental results (we note that that the experimental values from Refs. [10,11] differ by 4%, which exceeds their stated uncertainties of 0.7% and 1%, respectively). One possible source of such a discrepancy is the contribution of the 5d − 6s electric-quadrupole transition to the 5d lifetime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The theoretical values differ substantially, by over 5%, from the experimental results (we note that that the experimental values from Refs. [10,11] differ by 4%, which exceeds their stated uncertainties of 0.7% and 1%, respectively). One possible source of such a discrepancy is the contribution of the 5d − 6s electric-quadrupole transition to the 5d lifetime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, it is possible to check consistency between polarizability and lifetime measurements by deriving 5d − 6p matrix elements from 5d lifetime measurements and substituting these values into the 6p polarizability calculations. For either of the two experimental lifetimes, [10,11] this procedure yields a result that disagrees with directly measured polarizabilities [12,13,14] by several standard deviations.The particular all-order method used here is the linearized coupled-cluster method which sums infinite sets of many-body perturbation theory terms. We refer the reader to Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since this is the second closest blue-detuned magic wavelength to 852 nm, it has the second highest ground-state polarizability and therefore requires the second lowest optical intensity to generate the required trapping potential (we do not consider the magic wavelength at 792 nm, as it is too close to the 8S 1/2 to 6P 3/2 transition at 794 nm). We have neglected higher order processes in our analysis, including two-photon and electric quadrupole transitions, near 687 nm [50]. Figure 6.…”
Section: Magic Wavelengths For An Evanescent Field Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This E2 line has a transition rate of γ 5D−6S = 2π · 3.5 Hz [8]. Considering solely fluorescence decay, the saturation intensity behaves like I s = ∼ 2 Wcm −2 , where γ se 5D = 2π · 124 kHz is the fluorescence rate of 5D 5/2 state which almost exclusively comes from the 5D 5/2 → 6P 3/2 E1 line at 3.5 µm [22]. The 685 nm laser has an output power of 11 mW and a minimum beam waist around ω 0 = 125 µm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%