1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01438500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime of the metastable 6P 3/2 level of PbII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition wavelength for the transition 6P3/2--, 6P1/2 is 710 nm. We obtain a value of 40.0 ms which is in good accord with the experimental value of 41.2 ms [16]. We have also compared our calculations for the lifetimes of the excited state 2P~/2 for the ions Mg IV and Fe XVIII of the Fluorine isoetectronic sequence with the calculations using configuration interaction (CI) wavefunctions within the BreitPauli approximation [18,19].…”
Section: 2-7j (12)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The transition wavelength for the transition 6P3/2--, 6P1/2 is 710 nm. We obtain a value of 40.0 ms which is in good accord with the experimental value of 41.2 ms [16]. We have also compared our calculations for the lifetimes of the excited state 2P~/2 for the ions Mg IV and Fe XVIII of the Fluorine isoetectronic sequence with the calculations using configuration interaction (CI) wavefunctions within the BreitPauli approximation [18,19].…”
Section: 2-7j (12)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…This result and the improvements in the M 1 and E2 transition amplitudes due to the UCC formulation coupled together give a value of the lifetime of the 6 2 P 3/2 state of P b + that is clearly in better agreement with the corresponding CCSD(T) calculation. This value is within the limits of the experimental error [20], but this is not the case for CCSD(T).…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Calculations for Pb are limited to the positive ion because the treatment of the neutral atom would require a larger reference space ͑N v =10 or 12͒ that is no longer quasidegenerate and that therefore should be studied using third order H v relativistic calculations, which are not yet possible. Table I compares experimental [28][29][30][31] and calculated low lying excitation energies of Sr and Ba. Included also are coupled cluster ͑CC͒ calculations for Ba.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%