Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2020.th2a.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime Prediction of 1550 nm DFB Laser using Machine learning Techniques

Abstract: A novel approach based on an artificial neural network (ANN) for lifetime prediction of 1.55 µm InGaAsP MQW-DFB laser diodes is presented. It outperforms the conventional lifetime projection using accelerated aging tests. © 2020 The Author(s) OCIS codes: (140.0140) Lasers and laser optics; (200.4260) Neural Networks.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate and repeatable extrapolation results were obtained in S-on-1 laser-induced damage fatigue experiments. Besides, in [55], an ANN-based lifetime prediction of 1550 nm DFB laser was presented to output the possible mean-timeto-failure, which improved prediction error from 3.8-17 years to 1.12 years. Based on synthetic data and real laser datasheet including different operating conditions, this scheme effectively reduced the time and cost of aging tests, as summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate and repeatable extrapolation results were obtained in S-on-1 laser-induced damage fatigue experiments. Besides, in [55], an ANN-based lifetime prediction of 1550 nm DFB laser was presented to output the possible mean-timeto-failure, which improved prediction error from 3.8-17 years to 1.12 years. Based on synthetic data and real laser datasheet including different operating conditions, this scheme effectively reduced the time and cost of aging tests, as summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reliability metric) as a function of different laser degradation parameters. See [4] for more details on the process of synthetic reliability data generation. The correlation matrix shown in Figure 2 yielded that the two most important parameters influencing the laser reliability are junction temperature and the current.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%