1976
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(76)90706-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime studies of Ar-2p-vacancies travelling through solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11] Unfortunately, as for vacant 2pσ molecular orbitals (MOs) production, Morenzoni et al, Knudson et al, and Feldman et al argued that they originate from 2pσ -2pπ electron promotion, whether or not there are vacancies in higher-Z partner L-shell, i.e., 2pπ vacant MOs, before interactions with target atoms. [9,[12][13][14][15][16] In contrast, Winters et al and Mizogawa et al argued that the light-Z partner K-shell electrons can be directly removed to a level higher than 2p or continuum states, and then these vacancies evolve to 2pσ and share between two partners. Only if the higher-Z partners bear the L-shell vacancies, will the 2pσ -2pπ electron promotion predominate the 2pσ generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[9][10][11] Unfortunately, as for vacant 2pσ molecular orbitals (MOs) production, Morenzoni et al, Knudson et al, and Feldman et al argued that they originate from 2pσ -2pπ electron promotion, whether or not there are vacancies in higher-Z partner L-shell, i.e., 2pπ vacant MOs, before interactions with target atoms. [9,[12][13][14][15][16] In contrast, Winters et al and Mizogawa et al argued that the light-Z partner K-shell electrons can be directly removed to a level higher than 2p or continuum states, and then these vacancies evolve to 2pσ and share between two partners. Only if the higher-Z partners bear the L-shell vacancies, will the 2pσ -2pπ electron promotion predominate the 2pσ generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They also measured the 'effective' K-shell x-ray production of Al targets with varied thicknesses ranging from 0.5 to 25 µg cm −2 to study ion charge state effects for different target thicknesses. These studies stimulated interest in the charge state dependence of heavy ions as a function of target thickness [8,10,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. In the work by Betz et al [10] the rates of vacancy production, charge exchange and quenching for the projectile moving inside the solid target were included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work by Betz et al [10] the rates of vacancy production, charge exchange and quenching for the projectile moving inside the solid target were included. The variation of x-ray yield with target thickness for heavy ion collisions was fitted to a 2-component model [16,20,22,24] for projectiles containing 0 and 1 K-shell vacancy and later a 3-component model [27][28][29][30] that describes fractions of projectiles with 0, 1, and 2 K-shell vacancies inside the target. If the solid target is thin enough and approximately single-collision conditions exist [23,24,30], the x-ray production cross section can be determined as a function of the projectile charge state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar model was used to determine the number of 2p vacancies of an Ar projectile impinging on aluminium targets of varying thickness [12]. If the target radiation is not detectable the probe-layer technique can be advantageous [10,13,14,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%