1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.57.1870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifshitz theory of Casimir forces at finite temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These fluctuating charges are screened very effectively by a dielectric constant intervening between the walls and the system. For two dipoles this screening is proportional to On the other hand, if the cavities are filled with liquids with various values of μ from 1.7 to 4.02 (and ε being constant around ~32.7-34.82; case of methanol and nitrobenzene, respectively), the Casimir force is once more repulsive with an intensity of ~8.25 fN, indicating that the permeability of the liquids into the cavity is almost not affecting the Casimir force at all, in agreement with Lifshitz theory, where all magnetic properties of the involved media are neglected with the magnetic permeability set equal to 1 [27].…”
Section: Fig 5 (Color Online)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…These fluctuating charges are screened very effectively by a dielectric constant intervening between the walls and the system. For two dipoles this screening is proportional to On the other hand, if the cavities are filled with liquids with various values of μ from 1.7 to 4.02 (and ε being constant around ~32.7-34.82; case of methanol and nitrobenzene, respectively), the Casimir force is once more repulsive with an intensity of ~8.25 fN, indicating that the permeability of the liquids into the cavity is almost not affecting the Casimir force at all, in agreement with Lifshitz theory, where all magnetic properties of the involved media are neglected with the magnetic permeability set equal to 1 [27].…”
Section: Fig 5 (Color Online)supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Our starting point is the above formula (A8) for the ineraction of two perfectly conducting plates accross an intervening plasma as re-written by Ninham and Daicic. [29,35,36]…”
Section: Appendix B: Asymptotic Casimir Free Energy In a Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is misleading. It is due to the quantum nature of light [11,12]; this becomes obvious at the large separation limit where the weakening is independent of the speed of light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%