Lift Distributions for Minimum Induced Drag with Generalized Bending Moment Constraints

Abstract

The previous works of Prandtl, Jones, and Klein and Viswanathan addressed the problem of determining the lift distribution that minimizes induced drag for a given lift and specified bending moment. In these formulations, bending moment is considered to be a surrogate for wing weight. These classical methods require the bending constraints to be imposed at the same lift coefficient at which drag is minimized. In practice, however, it is commonly desired to minimize drag at a representative cruise lift coefficient while imposing the bending constraints at a limiting structural load condition, such as a maneuver lift coefficient. This paper presents an approach to extend the classical methods by allowing the bending constraints to be imposed at different lift coefficients than that at which induced drag is minimized. An example for a wing planform similar to that of a Boeing 737 shows that the penalty for optimizing induced drag at the maneuver lift coefficient as implied in the classical methods results in between a 1-10% increase in drag at cruise compared to the results from this new approach. It is expected that the new approach will enable the classical methods to be extended to practical applications in multidisciplinary wing design.

Aerodynamic Optimization of a UAV Wing subject to Weight, Geometric, Root Bending Moment, and Performance Constraints

“…By using converged circulation distribution, the lift ðLÞ [10], the induced drag ðD i Þ [10], and the root bending moment ðM b Þ [17] of the wing are calculated as follows:…”

Minimum Induced Drag for Tapered Wings Including Structural Constraints

“…Various analytic or low-order studies on minimizing induced drag using lifting-line theory and similar methods have been published since 1933. Whereas many of these studies approach the problem from a purely aerodynamic point of view [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], others follow an approach similar to that taken by Prandtl in 1933 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Many of the early analytical studies in this second group consider the wing structure independent of the wing geometry.…”

“…Similarly, comparing Eqs. (31) and 11gives a wingspan ratio 25shows that the influence of each Fourier coefficient decreases as n increases. This means that Eqs.…”

Global Optimization of Multimodal Aerodynamic Optimization Benchmark Case

“…A full discussion on optimal loadings subject to bending moment and lift constraints is comprehensively covered by Pate and German [50]. The induced drag can be calculated as:…”